2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-005-0018-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide risk management in Switzerland

Abstract: Six percent of Switzerland is prone to slope instability. New federal regulations require regional authorities (cantons) to generate natural hazard maps and the zoning of mass movements in order to restrict development on hazard-prone land. The Codes of Practice for hazard maps use red, blue and yellow respectively, to indicate areas of prohibited construction, construction with safety requirements and construction without restriction. They need considerable efforts to ensure communication with local populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The related processes are usually understood as translational sliding movements of soil material along a pre-defined slip surface at a depth of up to 2 m (Cruden and Varnes, 1996;Lateltin et al, 2005). In Austria, shallow landslides are typically triggered by heavy rainfalls (Andrecs et al, 2002;Markart et al, 2007;972 T. Zieher et al: Calibration of a dynamic physically based slope stability model tures and infrastructure, as well as a loss of agricultural land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related processes are usually understood as translational sliding movements of soil material along a pre-defined slip surface at a depth of up to 2 m (Cruden and Varnes, 1996;Lateltin et al, 2005). In Austria, shallow landslides are typically triggered by heavy rainfalls (Andrecs et al, 2002;Markart et al, 2007;972 T. Zieher et al: Calibration of a dynamic physically based slope stability model tures and infrastructure, as well as a loss of agricultural land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslides can be easily recognized by means of this approach, and geomorphological features associated with mass movements -such as scarps, counterscarps, trenches, debris flows, rockfalls and debris fans -can also be mapped. Based on these morphological characteristics, it will be also possible to define a qualitative state of activity (not based directly on their velocity), leading to the definition of landslide intensity (low, medium and high), in accordance with the landslide hazard degree calculation guidelines developed in Switzerland (Lateltin et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition of the glacial stadials in the Bedretto Valley was based on calculating the depression of the equilibrium line altitude of the glaciers (DELA) for all the main local stadials, which were subsequently grouped into regional stadials ( Table 2). The ELA was calculated using the accumulation area ratio (AAR) hypsometric method, based on a 0.67 ratio for the accumulation surface/total surface of a glacier (Kerschner, 1976;Gross et al, 1977), corresponding to a ratio of 2 : 1 between the accumulation surface and the ablation surface of a glacier. The DELA was calculated on the basis of the altitude difference between the former ELA and the ELA calculated for the end of the Little Ice Age (1850-1860 AD in the central and southern Swiss Alps), considered as the last important glacial stadial with the glaciers in a condition of climatic equilibrium (Dorthe-Monachon and Schoeneich, 1993).…”
Section: Case Study 2: Multi-methods Assessment Of Slope Tectonics Actmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Established according to the Swiss Guidelines for hazard zoning (Raetzo et al 2002;Lateltin et al 2005), important features of this procedure, based on trajectory modelling, are a quantitative consideration of the rock fall failure frequency and the actual combination of energy and frequency for hazard assessment.…”
Section: Original Cadanav Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12, the delineation of a high hazard zone up to x=133 m for T f =20 years·m, as given by original Cadanav, might be quite unfavourable, knowing that the new approach predicts in fact a moderate hazard zone between x=60 and x=120 m, approximately. As explained by Lateltin et al (2005), according to the Swiss Codes such a space could be destined to some development, instead of being totally forbidden. The same happens for the area located between x=40 and x=135 m, for T f =150 years·m, characterised by a sequence of low and moderate hazard zones.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%