2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-07660-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility assessment using analytic hierarchy process and weight of evidence methods in parts of the Rif chain (northernmost Morocco)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the bivariate statistical analysis, the weighting values for each factor class are obtained by combining the landslide inventory map with each data layer of conditioning factors. The frequency ratio (Lee and Sambath 2006;Lee and Pradhan 2007;Aditian et al 2018;Sharma and Mahajan 2018;Shano et al 2021;Bourenane et al 2021b), information value (Van Westen 1997, the weight of evidence (Pourghasemi et al 2012b;Ilia and Tsangaratos 2016;Es-smairi et al 2021), and evidential belief function (Althuwaynee et al 2012;Pourghasemi et al 2016;Feby et al 2020) models are the most important bivariate statistical methods used in LSM. While, in multivariate statistical approaches, the weights of landslide conditioning factors are based on the relative contribution of each factor in the presence or absence of the landslide events within a defined pixel unit (Ayalew and Yamagishi 2005;Nandi and Shakoor 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the bivariate statistical analysis, the weighting values for each factor class are obtained by combining the landslide inventory map with each data layer of conditioning factors. The frequency ratio (Lee and Sambath 2006;Lee and Pradhan 2007;Aditian et al 2018;Sharma and Mahajan 2018;Shano et al 2021;Bourenane et al 2021b), information value (Van Westen 1997, the weight of evidence (Pourghasemi et al 2012b;Ilia and Tsangaratos 2016;Es-smairi et al 2021), and evidential belief function (Althuwaynee et al 2012;Pourghasemi et al 2016;Feby et al 2020) models are the most important bivariate statistical methods used in LSM. While, in multivariate statistical approaches, the weights of landslide conditioning factors are based on the relative contribution of each factor in the presence or absence of the landslide events within a defined pixel unit (Ayalew and Yamagishi 2005;Nandi and Shakoor 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination effect of geological composition, landscapes complexity, abundant rainfall, seismic activity and the increasing magnitude of anthropogenic activities are considered the known framework of landslide conditioning factors at Rif scale (Millies-Lacroix1965; El Gharboui1980; Fares 1994;Es-smairi et al2021). Similar factors are active at the coastline between Tetouan and Bou-Ahmed and its hinterlands in addition to the action of Mediterranean sea that continuously undermines in downstream mountains extending into the sea resulting in instabilityand slope failure (Es-smairi et al 2021). The attracting geographical position of the coastlines and the hinterlands of the Rif domain, generally and more precisely covering our study area makes it more exposed to strong anthropogenic activitieslike the increasing housing and infrastructure development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have covered the study area (EL Fellah, 1994;El Fellah et al, 1996;Es-Smairi et al, 2021;Harmouzi et al, 2019;Mastere et al, 2017). The rst one is a preliminary reconnaissance site-speci c study and the last three works are landslide susceptibility assessing by ANN, AHP and Weight of evidence methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%