2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-07156-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility investigation for Idukki district of Kerala using regression analysis and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed the core area of the Minxian earthquake landslide using recursive feature elimination in a conventional machine learning model to narrow down 20 factors to the most influential ones, as shown in Figure 4. Different models identified different influential factors, leading to varied optimization outcomes as noted in previous studies [25]. To overcome this, we normalized, accumulated, and integrated the importance of each factor from all models with the results from the geographic detectors (Figure 3), achieving a universally applicable set of evaluation factors.…”
Section: The Optimization Of the Evaluation Factors Of The Seismic La...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We analyzed the core area of the Minxian earthquake landslide using recursive feature elimination in a conventional machine learning model to narrow down 20 factors to the most influential ones, as shown in Figure 4. Different models identified different influential factors, leading to varied optimization outcomes as noted in previous studies [25]. To overcome this, we normalized, accumulated, and integrated the importance of each factor from all models with the results from the geographic detectors (Figure 3), achieving a universally applicable set of evaluation factors.…”
Section: The Optimization Of the Evaluation Factors Of The Seismic La...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic landslide, as a nonlinear problem, is challenging to be resolved accurately by conventional statistical methods [12], while the toolset of machine learning methods has powerful data processing capability and various types of models, which are widely used in seismic landslide research [13], which contains logistic regression model [14][15][16][17], random forest [18][19][20], support vector machine [21,22], artificial neural networks [23], Bayesian classification [24], and others. However, because machine learning models depend mainly upon databases, data training may have appeared as a disadvantage, such as overfitting or underfitting and not allowing to extract useful interpretation [25,26]. Therefore, the selection of crucial evaluation factors and reduction in redundant factors in the dataset can not only resolve the fitting problem of machine learning but also reduce the computational burden and improve the efficiency of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been increasingly applied to various geological problems due to its ability to effectively tackle nonlinear problems, such as earthquake prediction (Laurenti et al, 2022), landslide hazard assessment (Collico et al, 2020;Ji et al, 2020;Jones et al, 2021;Du et al, 2022), meteorological and climate forecasting (Balogun et al, 2021;Zennaro et al, 2021), and geophysical data interpretation (Lawson et al, 2017;Maxwell et al, 2019;Politikos et al, 2021;Du et al, 2023). Scholars have made progress in the field of geological time series prediction using AI techniques, for example, wave height prediction (Gao et al, 2021), pore pressure prediction in landslides (Orland et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2021), and prediction of landslide displacement (Yang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, artificial intelligence methods have made significant strides in geological fields, including remote sensing [5][6][7][8], geological hazard prediction [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], geological exploration [17][18][19][20][21][22], and energy development [23]. However, the applicability and effectiveness of these methods in the specialized field of pipeline or cable (POC) detection remain inadequately explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%