2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b3-2020-1229-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping With Random Forest Model for Ordu, Turkey

Abstract: Abstract. Landslides are among commonly observed natural hazards all over the world and can be quite destructive for infrastructure and in settlement areas. Their occurrences are often related with extreme meteorological events and seismic activities. Preparation of landslide susceptibility maps is important for disaster mitigation efforts and to increase the resilience. The factors effective on landslide susceptibility map production depend mainly on the topography, land use and the geological characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were four ML and one AI algorithm employed in this study. They are distributed random forest (DRF) [30], generalized linear model (GLM) [31], extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [32], generalized boosting machine (GBM) [33], and deep learning (DL) [34]- [36]. These algorithms were trained as binomial classifiers as characterized by the training datasets of each method.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were four ML and one AI algorithm employed in this study. They are distributed random forest (DRF) [30], generalized linear model (GLM) [31], extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [32], generalized boosting machine (GBM) [33], and deep learning (DL) [34]- [36]. These algorithms were trained as binomial classifiers as characterized by the training datasets of each method.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancements in machine learning (ML) algorithms, geospatial technologies and computational power, production of LS maps have become less challenging. Among the common ML algorithms used for the LS mapping in the literature, the artificial neural networks (ANN), logistic regression (LR), deep learning methods, decision trees, random forest (RF), naïve Bayes tree, fuzzy logic and support vector machine (SVM) can be listed (e.g., see [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). The ML techniques can increase the accuracy of the LS maps [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orthophotos and the grid DSM/DTM have resolutions of 30 cm and 1 m, respectively, with a location accuracy of ca. 15 cm [61].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20% of the landslides were mapped on Early-Middle Eocene aged sandstone and mudstone, 20% of the landslides were mapped on Maastrichtian-Palaeocene aged mudstone, limestone, sandstone, and marl, and 16% of the landslides mapped on Middle-Late Eocene aged andesite, basalt, and pyroclastic rocks. Six topographic parameters, altitude, slope gradient, slope aspect, plan and profile slope curvatures, topographic wetness index, and a hydrological factor distance to drainage network were evaluated as the landslide preparatory parameters in the region [61]. Descriptive statistics of these parameters for the subarea and the area with landslides were investigated, respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%