Landslide Science and Practice 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide Susceptibility Maps for Spatial Planning in Lower Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the study area was divided into 16 modelling domains based on a simplified 1 : 200 000 lithological map ( Fig. 1; Schnabel, 2002;Bell et al, 2013). The lithological map gives details on the parent material available for soil formation.…”
Section: Modelling Of Heterogeneous Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the study area was divided into 16 modelling domains based on a simplified 1 : 200 000 lithological map ( Fig. 1; Schnabel, 2002;Bell et al, 2013). The lithological map gives details on the parent material available for soil formation.…”
Section: Modelling Of Heterogeneous Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study from Predeal is different to other studies of landslide susceptibility in Lower Austria (Bell et al . ) or Sub‐Carpathians in Romania (Constantin et al . ) since it was focused at a scale of 1:5000 (similar to urban master plan maps) and as a result could be integrated into the urban planning strategies relatively easily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to generate an enhanced landslide susceptibility map for Vorarlberg (including e.g. an enlarged landslides inventory), we used a routine which was already successfully applied to two other provinces in Austria (Petschko et al, 2013b(Petschko et al, , 2014Bell et al, 2013;Klingseisen and Leopold, 2006). Three major data sets constitute the main input for deriving model input parameters as well as for model training and evaluation purposes:…”
Section: Modeling Landslide Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%