2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landslide susceptibility zonation method based on C5.0 decision tree and K-means cluster algorithms to improve the efficiency of risk management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16a2,b2,c2,d2,e2). Overall, the silhouette coefficient of the precipitation clustering results under the historical and four SSPs are higher than 0.5, indicating that the clustering effects are acceptable (Guo et al 2021b;Jing et al 2021). The classification results of precipitation clusters are closely related to the spatial distribution of precipitation amount (Fig.…”
Section: Cluster Analysis Of Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…16a2,b2,c2,d2,e2). Overall, the silhouette coefficient of the precipitation clustering results under the historical and four SSPs are higher than 0.5, indicating that the clustering effects are acceptable (Guo et al 2021b;Jing et al 2021). The classification results of precipitation clusters are closely related to the spatial distribution of precipitation amount (Fig.…”
Section: Cluster Analysis Of Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The calculated FR values of the corresponding environmental factors are set as the inputs of the machine learning. Finally, the trained machine learning is used to predict the CSIs of all grid cells in An'yuan County (Guo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Training and Validation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the target definition, or rather, collection of samples for training, ML approaches can automatically analyze and extract rules from the input data to make predictions 14 . Meanwhile, it is highly efficient in calculating high-dimension data and can fit the nonlinear relationships between target and factors 8 , 29 ā€“ 31 . Nevertheless, the prediction accuracy of the most studies, even including those harnessing the hotspotted deep learning techniques 32 ā€“ 35 , comes between 75 and 85%, except for those of Huangfu et al 36 , Ou et al 26 , Zhang et al 27 and Zhou et al 28 , who have achieved landslide risk prediction with an accuracy of 86ā€“94.54%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%