2014 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics &Amp; Vision (ICARCV) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icarcv.2014.7064372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lane marking based vehicle localization using particle filter and multi-kernel estimation

Abstract: Vehicle localization is the primary information needed for advanced tasks like navigation. This information is usually provided by the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. However, the low accuracy of GPS in urban environments makes it unreliable for further treatments. The combination of GPS data and additional sensors can improve the localization precision. In this article, a marking feature based vehicle localization method is proposed, able to enhance the localization performance. To this end,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As summarized in the survey paper by Hillel et al in [68], most of the lane line detection algorithms share three common steps: (1) lane line feature extraction, by edge detection [76,77] and color [78,79], by learning algorithms such as SVM [80], or by boost classification [81,82]; (2) fitting the pixels into different models, e.g., straight lines [83,84], parabolas [85,86], hyperbolas [87][88][89], and even zigzag line [90]; (3) estimating the vehicle pose based on the fitted model. A fourth time integration step may exist before the vehicle pose estimation in order to impose temporal continuity, where the detection result in the current frame is used to guide the next search through filter mechanisms, such as Kalman filter [76,91] and particle filter [80,90,92].…”
Section: Lane Line Marking Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in the survey paper by Hillel et al in [68], most of the lane line detection algorithms share three common steps: (1) lane line feature extraction, by edge detection [76,77] and color [78,79], by learning algorithms such as SVM [80], or by boost classification [81,82]; (2) fitting the pixels into different models, e.g., straight lines [83,84], parabolas [85,86], hyperbolas [87][88][89], and even zigzag line [90]; (3) estimating the vehicle pose based on the fitted model. A fourth time integration step may exist before the vehicle pose estimation in order to impose temporal continuity, where the detection result in the current frame is used to guide the next search through filter mechanisms, such as Kalman filter [76,91] and particle filter [80,90,92].…”
Section: Lane Line Marking Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane markings are the most popularly used symbols for vehicle localization. Nedevschi et al [19], Jo et al [20], Lu et al [21], Gruyer et al [22], Tao et al [23], Shunsuke et al [24], and Suhr et al [2] utilize a variety of types of cameras to detect lane markings for vehicle localization purposes. In particular, Nedevschi et al [19] not only recognize positions of lanes but also their types (e.g., double, single, interrupted, and merge) as additional information.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The price of vision sensor is low but the information from them are helpful for estimating the vehicle position. The lane marking detection for localization is one of the research that can improve the accuracy of the localization (Lu et al, 2014). Visual odometry approach can * Corresponding author compute the relative poses in the sequential images in real time (Nister et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%