2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LANET: Visible-light ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors in other works discuss purely VLC MAC, and further, we discuss these works. Memedi et al investigate collision probability in V‐VLC (Vehicular VLC) through simulation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Authors in other works discuss purely VLC MAC, and further, we discuss these works. Memedi et al investigate collision probability in V‐VLC (Vehicular VLC) through simulation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the network size increases, the number of nodes contending for channel access also increases resulting in increased probability of channel access failure given in (5) and plotted in Figure 9A. As the failure probability of channel access increases, the probability of success in a high number of backoff attempts also increases as given in (11), resulting in large backoff delay given in (12). For both RBT scheme and IEEE 802.15.7 delay increases with increase in the number of nodes.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It generally works at infrared (IR), visible light, and ultraviolet (UV) bands and spectrum ranges of 430-790 THz [150]. It has several advantages compared with DSRC's RF technology; for example, it has no adverse electromagnetic interference (EMI) effect, possesses low latency, has additional complementary bandwidth for RF, and is less susceptible to security breaches [151]. The applications of VLC in VANET can be found in several V2V communication types, such as lane change information, V2B, sensing before any crash, and traffic signaling.…”
Section: B: Visible Light Communication (Vlc) For Vanetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used as an alternative solution of DSRC when overcrowding occurs [152]. The main disadvantages of VLC in VANET are as follows: it requires line-of-sight (LOS) communication, it has a very short range capability, it exerts a shadowing effect, suffers from interference with direct sunlight, absorption, and scattering, and depends on weather conditions [151].…”
Section: B: Visible Light Communication (Vlc) For Vanetmentioning
confidence: 99%