2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.113.038301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langevin and Fokker-Planck Analyses of Inhibited Molecular Passing Processes Controlling Transport and Reactivity in Nanoporous Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. 34). Next, we provide a more comprehensive picture of the variation of P(d) versus d by combining the simulation results for ∆t = 0.01 with analytic insights into behavior for d close to d c and for large d.…”
Section: B Passing Propensity: Simulations and Analytic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ref. 34). Next, we provide a more comprehensive picture of the variation of P(d) versus d by combining the simulation results for ∆t = 0.01 with analytic insights into behavior for d close to d c and for large d.…”
Section: B Passing Propensity: Simulations and Analytic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis will be augmented exploiting analytic results motivated by the equivalent Fokker-Planck formulation for this diffusive passing problem and associated first-passage problems. 34 We also utilize analytic results which provide insight into the form of P(d) for both large and small d where Langevin simulation is inefficient. For example, for small d, these analytic results reveal a non-trivial scaling of the form 34 P ∼ A(dd c ) σ for d just above the critical value, d c , of the pore diameter for the onset of SFD due to steric blocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Γ ⊥ (2) will exhibit a power-law relationship with Γ (1) , expressed as Γ ⊥ (2)~( Γ (1) ) 2 3 ⁄ . Such a wrong dependence of Γ ⊥ (2) on Γ (1) given by the assumption ( ⊥ = * ) is shown in Fig. 5(b), as a comparison of the correct dependence in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the concept of λ , we define an effective Saffman length * for a particle monolayer near a water-oil interface, expressed as * ≡ Γ (1) 6 ⁄ . The effective Saffman length is the ratio of the friction coefficient Γ (1) of the particles in the monolayer to the traditional friction coefficient 6 of the particles in a bulk liquid. In the present system, the effective coefficient * is written as * = Γ (1)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct molecular or Langevin dynamics simulation [26][27][28] is not viable to describe the overall reactiondiffusion process on the appropriate time scale (i.e., reactants entering, diffusing within, reacting, and products diffusing within and being extruded from the pore, with dynamics generally mediated by the presence of a solvent). Thus, instead spatially discrete coarse-grained stochastic modeling is typically implemented [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%