“…Therefore, and because the purpose of this Review is not to describe the different bottom-up fabrication methods to achieve surface modification and functionalization, the reader is referred to some excellent reviews on this subject. ,,− Nevertheless, a brief description and comparison of the most common bottom-up surface engineering technologies is provided in this Review along with their main advantages and disadvantages. Bottom-up nanofabrication methods include Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) − and self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). − Both methods, which enable the fabrication of closely packed, well-ordered, and organized monolayers and allow for the immobilization of several functional molecules onto surfaces, present some drawbacks that limit their practical applications. , In the case of the LB method, the expensive and specialized instrumentation, the long construction times, and the need for specific and limited molecules, namely, amphiphilic molecules, to prepare the films represent great shortcomings that limit its applicability. Moreover, although this method allows us to prepare multilayer films from oriented monolayers, the absence of a strong molecular interaction between the film and the solid support (no chemisorption is involved during the formation of the LB films) is a problem due to its mechanical instability, which limits the stability and robustness of the films under ambient and physiological conditions and, thus, makes difficult the transfer of the molecules of the film from the air–water interface to the solid support.…”