1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.55.3450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Langmuir probe measurements in an inductively coupled plasma source

Abstract: Measurements of the plasma potential, electron density, effective electron temperature, and electron energy distribution function ͑EEDF͒ have been performed with Langmuir probes in planar, electrostatically shielded, low-pressure inductively coupled plasmas. The plasma source is a modification of the Gaseous Electronics Conference RF Reference Cell ͓P. J. Hargis et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 140 ͑1994͔͒ with the upper electrode replaced by a five-turn planar coil and a quartz vacuum interface. Four different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
80
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the slope in figure 4(b) one can calculate the inductance which is L II = 1.4 μH. This value is important for different numerical simulations and is comparable with the literature [26,30,43,46,48]. For the determination of the absorbed power P abs , the coil resistance R coil have to be determined [49].…”
Section: Voltage and Current Probe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the slope in figure 4(b) one can calculate the inductance which is L II = 1.4 μH. This value is important for different numerical simulations and is comparable with the literature [26,30,43,46,48]. For the determination of the absorbed power P abs , the coil resistance R coil have to be determined [49].…”
Section: Voltage and Current Probe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,7,8 Several attempts have been made to measure the electrical and plasma characteristics of inductive discharges. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] These parameters were obtained for different reactor configurations, of different sizes, operational under different gas types and pressures, at different driving frequencies. To propose an ICP scaling law based on these measurements is difficult because its characteristics are device specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the electron energy probability function (EEPF) at several pressures at the input power of 600 W. The EEPFs are in a strict manner non-Maxwellian for the entire energy range. Especially non-Maxwellian EEPFs were observed for all energies above the energy range for elastic collisions [29]. However, in a rough manner, we can state that at low pressure, the EEPF is close to a Maxwellian.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%