2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and cluster-specific effects in the timing of onset consonant sequences in seven languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in Section 3.1, this is not what is predicted by either hypothesis but is an exact reversal of the pattern predicted by H1 (see Figure 6 left, above). Of further interest is that the values of constriction duration overlap are negative across all sonority shapes; the uniformity suggests that this may be a language-wide timing pattern, which is consistent with the findings of Pouplier et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As mentioned in Section 3.1, this is not what is predicted by either hypothesis but is an exact reversal of the pattern predicted by H1 (see Figure 6 left, above). Of further interest is that the values of constriction duration overlap are negative across all sonority shapes; the uniformity suggests that this may be a language-wide timing pattern, which is consistent with the findings of Pouplier et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, all three possible scenarios have been observed across different languages: cue enhancement of more difficult clusters in Tsou, no difference based on cluster difficulty in Russian, and less cue enhancement in more difficult clusters in Tashlhiyt. Indeed, there is much work outlining how onset cluster production is highly cross-linguistically variable (e.g., Pouplier et al, 2022). Exploring how listener-oriented speaking styles influence onset cluster production and perception across different languages is an avenue that future work can explore this issue more extensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the general agreement that voiced and voiceless aspirates have similar timing of spread-glottis gestures relative to the consonantal constrictions they are coordinated with, there is substantial cross-linguistic and cross-talker variation in the timing and coordination of these gestural complexes (see, e.g., Hoole & Bombien 2017; Pouplier et al. 2022), which is also modulated by prosodic factors such as phrasing and prominence (Bombien, Mooshammer, Hoole & Kuehnert 2008; Hoole, Bombien, Kühnert, & Mooshammer 2009; Bombien 2011; Hoole & Bombien 2017). More generally, it is well documented in the literature that speech rate and prosodic structure modulate the production and acoustics of contrasts involving aspiration (see Beckman, Helgason, McMurray & Ringen 2011; Krivokapić 2014; Kim, Kim & Cho 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%