2019
DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1605958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and environmental justice: articulating intersectionality within energy policy deliberations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Processes surrounding policy formation and even information access are shaped by meta-power, constraining who is able to authentically access and influence policy discussions, processes, and outcomes. For example, in this issue, George (2019) observes that individuals potentially impacted by proposed energy extraction projects have little advance notice, reducing their capacity to successfully mobilize and challenge projects' permitting or potential impacts in a meaningful and influential way. Similarly, in Jalbert's et al's (2019) contribution to this issue, the authors argue that control over informational aspects of procedural equity in environmental decisionmaking can amount to a form of data injustice.…”
Section: Social Spaces Where Scales Meet: Bridging Research On Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes surrounding policy formation and even information access are shaped by meta-power, constraining who is able to authentically access and influence policy discussions, processes, and outcomes. For example, in this issue, George (2019) observes that individuals potentially impacted by proposed energy extraction projects have little advance notice, reducing their capacity to successfully mobilize and challenge projects' permitting or potential impacts in a meaningful and influential way. Similarly, in Jalbert's et al's (2019) contribution to this issue, the authors argue that control over informational aspects of procedural equity in environmental decisionmaking can amount to a form of data injustice.…”
Section: Social Spaces Where Scales Meet: Bridging Research On Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%