Background Children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) are reported to have socio-communicative impairments. Although many of these children are diagnosed with intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD), these populations are seldom used as control groups. Hence, information regarding syndrome-specific sociocommunicative challenges is lacking.Method Parental concerns regarding everyday communication were investigated by means of the Children's Communication Checklist-2-NL (Geurts, 2007). Twenty children with 22q11.2DS (chronological age 6 years-13 years 3 months) were compared to twenty-one children with idiopathic ID and twenty-three children with idiopathic ID and comorbid ASD. All groups were matched for fluid intelligence (Gf), chronological age and core language scores. Results Neglect or inadequate use of context information was more prevalent in children with 22q11.2DS than in children with idiopathic ID. Nonverbal communication seemed less impaired than in children with ID+ASD. Conclusion Pragmatic language skills and developmental trajectories in children with 22q11.2DS merit further investigation. allow us to describe subtle group differences. The following questions are addressed: (1) Do parents of children with 22q11.2DS report specific socio-communicative challenges in comparison to parents of children with ID, but different from those reported by parents of children with ID+ASD? (2) Do parents of children with 22q11.2DS and comorbid ASD diagnosis (n = 5, 25%) have different concerns regarding communicative behaviours than those of parents of children with 22q11.2DS only and parents of children with idiopathic ID+ASD?
Methods
Research design and matching procedureThe 64 participants selected in the present study were a subgroup of an initial cohort consisting of 27 children with 22q11.2DS, 31 children with ID and 34 children with ID+ASD, all evaluated by means of a comprehensive language and cognitive assessment. A crosssectional group-matched research design was chosen. Exclusion criteria for all participants were prematurity (i.e. birth before 37 weeks), given its proven impact on language development (Barre, Morgan, Doyle, & Anderson, 2011;Crosbie, Holm, Wandschneider, & Hemsley, 2011), and severe sensorimotor deficits (hearing loss ≥ 40 dB HL or severe visual impairments). In addition, only monolingual Dutch-speaking children were included in the study. If this criterion was not met, a minimum of 3 years of full-time Dutch education needed to be demonstrated. This inclusion criterion was applied because of the impact of a multilingual environment on language development (Cummins, 2000;Paradis, Genessee, & Crago, 2011).Children with 22q11.2DS, were selected and contacted by the Center for Human Genetics (University Hospital Leuven, UZ Leuven). Children with idiopathic ID with or without ASD were recruited in several special needs schools in Flanders, Belgium. Children were first selected for their chronological age (primary school age, minimum age 6 years old) and t...