2010
DOI: 10.4135/9781452219677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language and Literacy in Inquiry-Based Science: Classrooms, Grades 3–8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For genre analysis, each text was scored on answers to six questions related to the purpose, as well as the structural and lexical conventions, of the target genre. These questions were generated based on prior work by SFL scholars that has identified structural and lexicogrammatical features characteristic of common school-based genres (e.g., Brisk, 2015; Christie & Derewianka, 2008; Coffin, 2006; Fang, 2010). An affirmative answer (yes) to each question scores 1 point, and a negative answer (no) scores 0 point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For genre analysis, each text was scored on answers to six questions related to the purpose, as well as the structural and lexical conventions, of the target genre. These questions were generated based on prior work by SFL scholars that has identified structural and lexicogrammatical features characteristic of common school-based genres (e.g., Brisk, 2015; Christie & Derewianka, 2008; Coffin, 2006; Fang, 2010). An affirmative answer (yes) to each question scores 1 point, and a negative answer (no) scores 0 point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Text authoritativeness refers to the degree of personal involvement and expertness in presenting information (Fang, 2008(Fang, , 2010. Texts written for everyday interactional purposes often feature a high degree of personal involvement and low degree of authority through the use of personal pronouns (I, we), interrogative sentences (e.g., Do you know….?…”
Section: Authoritativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…77 No. 5 March-April 2024 literacyworldwide.org confiscation of property, Jews), declarative sentences, passive voice (e.g., was blown up, was sealed), and complex syntax with implicit logical-semantic links (Fang, 2010).…”
Section: Table 5 Cloze Passage On Whooping Cranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scientific explanation is one of the four major genres of science, in addition to information report, experimental account, and argument. Several functional linguists (e.g., Fang et al, 2010; Unsworth, 2001) have analyzed scientific genres and identified a number of distinct functional stages and linguistic characteristics. These functional stages and linguistic characteristics are summarized in Table 1 (Tang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Research On Diagrams and Explanations In Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of scientific explanation based on theories and models to account for a specific phenomenon or situation is a central part of science (National Research Council, 2012; Osborne & Patterson, 2011). Several studies investigating the nature of scientific explanation have been carried out from a range of perspectives, including the philosophy of science (e.g., Braaten & Windschitl, 2011; de Andrade et al, 2019; Tang, 2016), linguistic and genre theories (e.g., Fang et al, 2010; Seah, 2015; Unsworth, 2001), mechanistic reasoning (e.g., Moreira et al, 2019; Russ et al, 2008; Talanquer, 2010), and textbook analysis (e.g., Dimopoulos et al, 2005; Velentzas & Halkia, 2018). However, most of these accounts tend to foreground the verbal (written or spoken) explanations without analyzing the characteristics of diagrams that are central rather than auxiliary to the construction of explanation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%