Research Findings.
This study aimed to (a) provide an in-depth description of the frequency and type of language interactions that
children who are low-income and/or dual language learners (DLL) experience in their classrooms and (b) examine whether
differenceFor instance, in a randomized control trial with 461 first grade s exist in children’s language experiences
based on children’s DLL status and level of English proficiency. Using the Language Interaction Snapshot, we observed
four focal children in each of 72 early childhood classrooms: one monolingual English-speaking child (i.e., non-DLL), one
Spanish-dominant DLL child, and two bilingual Spanish-English DLL children. Findings indicate that both lead and assistant
teachers predominantly spoke in English and implemented few evidence-based language practices. Children spoke more often to
peers than to teachers. Little variation was noted in the quality of the language environment for children based on their DLL
status or language proficiency.
Practice.
Results suggest clear directions for professional development (PD). PD must include both lead and assistant teachers
and should focus on evidence-based language strategies for facilitating children’s language development, including how
to effectively teach DLLs. Teachers may also benefit from PD that supports use of small group activity and peer
strategies.