Language and theory-of-mind development in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants: a preliminary investigation

Abstract

One cognitive domain in which deaf children are known to lag behind their hearing peers is that of ‘theory of mind’. Impoverished early conversational experience and deprivation of discussion about intangible mental states are seen as likely contributors to this deficit. The present study explored the relation between language and theory‐of‐mind capabilities in prelingually deafened children aged 4 to 11 years who were cochlear implant users. The children completed theory‐of‐mind tasks that indexed their ability to reason about conflicting mental representations, namely the understanding of false belief and the distinction between appearance and reality. Controlling for age, language ability was found to correlate positively and reliably with theory‐of‐mind performance. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Reading the Mind or Only the Story? Sharing Fiction to Develop ToM With Deaf Children

“…There are equally strong support mechanisms for families who choose sign language as a mode of communication and those who prefer to use spoken language via initiatives such as the family sign curriculum or auditory verbal therapy. As confidence grows in developing shared language competence with deaf children, there is a need to be mindful of the part that those around the child play in developing social cognition (Ketelaar, Rieffe, Wiefferink, & Frijns, 2012; Macaulay, 2006; Remmel & Peters, 2009) and the uncertainties and challenges this may bring.…”

Enhancing Theory-of-Mind Discourse among Deaf Parents of Children with Hearing Loss

“…Results reveal that orally-communicating and late-signing children are delayed not just on standard false-belief tasks but in understanding mental states in general. It has been suggested that the reason for the difficulties in understanding ToM exhibited by these children is related to their limited participation in high quality social interactions involving mental discourse, in their family or educational setting (Jeanes, Nienhuys, & Rickards, 2000;Macaulay & Ford, 2006;Preisler, Tvingstedt, & Ahlstrom, 2002).…”