2020
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0404-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language as shaped by the environment: linguistic construal in a collaborative spatial task

Abstract: What causes cultural groups to favour specific conventions over others? Recently, it has been suggested that cross-linguistic variation can be motivated by factors of the wider non-linguistic environment. Large-scale cross-sectional studies have found statistical differences among languages that pattern with environmental variables such as topography or population size. However, these studies are correlational in nature, revealing little about the possible mechanisms driving these cultural evolutionary process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research on the relation between environment, language and cognition has mostly involved either in vitro controlled experiments using a man-made environment (e.g., Christensen et al, 2016;Nölle et al, 2020), or a data analytic approach looking at the correspondences between two different systems without accounting for possible interactions that may impact either system (e.g., Everett, 2013;Palmer et al, 2017). In contrast with such paradigms, our methodology is inspired by Wilhelm Dilthey's notion of human sciences as a field of scholarship (Makkreel and Rodi, 1990).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on the relation between environment, language and cognition has mostly involved either in vitro controlled experiments using a man-made environment (e.g., Christensen et al, 2016;Nölle et al, 2020), or a data analytic approach looking at the correspondences between two different systems without accounting for possible interactions that may impact either system (e.g., Everett, 2013;Palmer et al, 2017). In contrast with such paradigms, our methodology is inspired by Wilhelm Dilthey's notion of human sciences as a field of scholarship (Makkreel and Rodi, 1990).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such temporary constructions can be seen as referential or conceptual pacts that interlocutors converge on when negotiating shared perspectives. They also represent adaptations to specific usage contexts and specific social and environmental conditions [69,[81][82][83]. Examples of such temporary constructions can be found in everyday discourse, e.g.…”
Section: The Enchronic Timescalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From such an evolutionary perspective, it is also highly relevant which factors influence the process of setting up conceptual pacts, as they can shed light on the processes involved in the first protolanguage users setting up conceptual pacts in interaction to solve communicative tasks. Conceptual pacts for situations where interlocutors need to agree on a new referring expression can also be influenced by the affordances of the environment (Nölle et al, 2020). However, as soon as they acquire a history of being successfully used to solve recurrent interactional tasks, especially when used with multiple interactants, just as other processes of interactive alignment they can acquire degrees of conventionalisation (Garrod and Doherty, 1994), and have also been implicated in potentially leading to processes of language change and grammaticalization (Nölle et al, 2020;Pickering and Garrod, 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Pactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual pacts for situations where interlocutors need to agree on a new referring expression can also be influenced by the affordances of the environment (Nölle et al, 2020). However, as soon as they acquire a history of being successfully used to solve recurrent interactional tasks, especially when used with multiple interactants, just as other processes of interactive alignment they can acquire degrees of conventionalisation (Garrod and Doherty, 1994), and have also been implicated in potentially leading to processes of language change and grammaticalization (Nölle et al, 2020;Pickering and Garrod, 2017). Both interactive alignment and the specific process of forming conceptual pacts therefore are potentially important interactional mechanisms involved in the emergence of (proto)constructions in the evolution of (proto)language(s).…”
Section: Conceptual Pactsmentioning
confidence: 99%