2006
DOI: 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Contraction, Revitalization, and Irish Women

Abstract: In Dublin, Ireland, the gendering of Irish Sign Language (ISL) is extreme among women born before 1931 and men born before 1946. These groups are products of two gendersegregated residential schools for the deaf. The language differences emerging from the schools were sufficiently divergent to obscure communication by gender. Yet, as adults, rather than embrace their gendered language differences, most women and men sought ways to eradicate them. Essentially the eradication process nearly eliminated the female… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though it has also cultivated a great number of deaf students, its influence on SCSL is limited. As we know from Chen and Luo, in the 1940s, most laymen graduates gave up French signs or finger-spellings and adopted SCSL, which echoed the findings of Leeson and Grehan (2004) and LeMaster (2006).…”
Section: Genetic Relations Among Deaf Schools and The Spread Of Scslsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Though it has also cultivated a great number of deaf students, its influence on SCSL is limited. As we know from Chen and Luo, in the 1940s, most laymen graduates gave up French signs or finger-spellings and adopted SCSL, which echoed the findings of Leeson and Grehan (2004) and LeMaster (2006).…”
Section: Genetic Relations Among Deaf Schools and The Spread Of Scslsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Second, among Dubois and Horvath's (2000:311) youngest generation of Cajun English speakers, women's rates of nasalization and voiceless stop nonaspiration virtually reach zero, whereas men "recycle" these older markers of Cajun English; these are features, in other words, for which young men retain variable grammars and which young women avoid categorically. Finally, several generations of gender-segregated Deaf schooling in Dublin resulted in gendered Irish Sign Language lexicons-including signs as commonplace as those for girl, work, and use-that persisted after students left school and were sufficiently distinct to impede cross-gender ISL communication (LeMaster, 2006). In short, despite widespread and well-documented differences in rates of variable usage between women's and men's speech, the conventional wisdom that women and men share membership in the speech communities they inhabitand thus women and men share variable grammars of internal constraints on variation-has not typically been examined.…”
Section: G E N D E R a N D S O C I O L I N G U I S T I C Va R I A T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 2019); studies of human care‐worker interactions with nonhuman primates in a political era simultaneously calling for decolonization while confronting species extinction (Parreñas 2018); analyses of science and technology studies through a feminist Indigenous lens (Tallbear 2017); examinations of the political manipulation and negotiation of affective and communicative labors of impoverished women in El Alto, Brazil (Scott 2017); and the documentation of the gendered inequalities in language loss (see LeMaster 2006). Important work has also examined marital rape laws (see Yllö and Torres 2016), global development policies (see Sen 2018), and the connections between neoliberal welfare policies and family violence (Adelman 2017).…”
Section: Conclusion: Feminist Anthropologies and The Futures Of Pracmentioning
confidence: 99%