1989
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/44.3.m85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Deficits in Depression: Comparisons with SDAT and Normal Aging

Abstract: In order to contribute to the definition of the structure of cognitive deficits in major depression/unipolar, language processing was studied in 20 elderly persons with major depression/unipolar, 23 elderly with SDAT, and 20 normal elderly. Measures administered included the Western Aphasia Battery, Test for Syntactic Complexity, and Chomsky Test of Syntax. Results indicate that depressed elderly performance on structural language variables of repetition, naming, auditory verbal comprehension, syntax, and read… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrate that it did not: no differences between the AD and AD/D groups were observed in letter fluency, category fluency, block design or clock drawing. The lack of additional effect of depression on verbal and visuospatial performance in AD should be viewed in light of the fact that depression-related deficits have been observed in these cognitive domains among nondemented individuals [17 [20][21][22]32]. Moreover, the nonexistent effects of depression in this study may not be attributable to measurement artifacts; no floor or ceiling effects were apparent in the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results demonstrate that it did not: no differences between the AD and AD/D groups were observed in letter fluency, category fluency, block design or clock drawing. The lack of additional effect of depression on verbal and visuospatial performance in AD should be viewed in light of the fact that depression-related deficits have been observed in these cognitive domains among nondemented individuals [17 [20][21][22]32]. Moreover, the nonexistent effects of depression in this study may not be attributable to measurement artifacts; no floor or ceiling effects were apparent in the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Relatedly, clinical depression is known to influence multiple cognitive abilities including memory [18,19], verbal ability [17,20,21] and visuospatial skill [21,22], although the size of depression-related cognitive impairments is considerably smaller than what is true in dementia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of grammatical processing in AD have been controversial. Some work shows successful processing of syntax and grammar in these patients (Blanken, Dittman, Haas, & Wallesch, 1987;Illes, 1990;Irigaray, 1973;Kemper, LaBarge, Ferraro, Cheung, & Storandt, 1993;Kempler, Curtiss, & Jackson, 1987), while other reports describe grammatical impairments (Croot, Hodges, & Patterson, 1999;Emery & Breslau, 1989;Kempler, Almor, Tyler, Andersen, & MacDonald, 1998;Rochon, Waters, & Caplan, 1994). We and others find that AD patients have difficulty with grammatical processing, but experimental evidence attributes this to a limitation of the executive resources needed to process long-distance grammatical dependencies in a sentence.…”
Section: Preserved Grammatical Processing Of Novel Form Class Knowledmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Published work reports comparisons of various combinations of these clinical groups, AD, VaD, depressed and normal elderly (Bayles and Boone, 1982;Hier et al, 1985;Emery and Breslau, 1989) Both dementia groups in this study have mean scores on the MMSE and CAMCOG indicating mild impairment. All dementia patients had NART scores of above average, indicating a high degree of intellectual ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%