2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language-dependent pitch encoding advantage in the brainstem is not limited to acceleration rates that occur in natural speech

Abstract: Experience-dependent enhancement of neural encoding of pitch in the auditory brainstem has been observed for only specific portions of native pitch contours exhibiting high rates of pitch acceleration, irrespective of speech or nonspeech contexts. This experiment allows us to determine whether this language-dependent advantage transfers to acceleration rates that extend beyond the pitch range of natural speech. Brainstem frequency following responses (FFRs) were recorded from Chinese and English participants i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Δ F 0 from turning point to offset was fixed across stimuli at 30.84 Hz (4.6 st; 0.38 octaves). This Δ F 0 value is comparable to that of an exemplary Tone 2 citation form (Krishnan et al, 2010) and is an effective cue for the perception of isolated Tone 2 (Moore & Jongman, 1997). The turning point was located at about ≈26% of the duration of the F 0 contour (40 ms, T2_150; 53 ms, T2_200; 66 ms, T2_250).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Δ F 0 from turning point to offset was fixed across stimuli at 30.84 Hz (4.6 st; 0.38 octaves). This Δ F 0 value is comparable to that of an exemplary Tone 2 citation form (Krishnan et al, 2010) and is an effective cue for the perception of isolated Tone 2 (Moore & Jongman, 1997). The turning point was located at about ≈26% of the duration of the F 0 contour (40 ms, T2_150; 53 ms, T2_200; 66 ms, T2_250).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The average velocity rates (in st/s), calculated from the turning point to F 0 offset, for T2_250 (25.6), T2_200 (32.1), and T2_150 (42.7) fall within the physiological limits of speed of rising pitch changes. As reflected by FFR responses in the brainstem (Krishnan, Gandour, Smalt, & Bidelman, 2010, p. 96, Figs. 2–3), a scaled variant of Tone 2 with a velocity rate of 51.94 st/s falls within the bounds of the normal voice range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Δ F 0 from turning point to offset was fixed across stimuli at 30.84 Hz (4.6 st; 0.38 octaves). This Δ F 0 value is comparable to that of an exemplary Tone 2 citation form (Krishnan, Gandour, Smalt, et al, 2010) and is an effective cue for the perception of isolated Tone 2 (Moore & Jongman, 1997). The turning point was located at about ≈26% of the duration of the F 0 contour (40 ms, T2_150; 53 ms, T2_200; 66 ms, T2_250).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This heightened sensitivity to sections characterized by rapid changes in pitch is maintained even in severely degraded stimuli (Krishnan et al, 2010a). Particularly relevant here are our previous results (Krishnan et al, 2010b) that exhibit more robust brainstem representation of pitch relevant information in Chinese listeners, relative to English, across a four-step acceleration rate continuum where the lowest rate was equivalent to Mandarin Tone 2 (T2) and the fastest rate fell well outside the normal range of dynamic pitch. Regardless of language group, neural periodicity strength was greater in response to acceleration rates within or proximal to natural speech relative to those beyond its range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Results showed that the magnitude of CPR components (Na-Pb and Pb-Nb) were larger for Chinese listeners in response to pitch stimuli, all of which fell within the range of T2 citation forms. It remains to be determined whether language-dependent effects on CPR components will extend across a range of acceleration rates, including those that exceed the normal pitch range as reported in the auditory brainstem (Krishnan et al, 2010b). Though it is true that both brainstem and CPR responses are of a sensory nature, they index pitch-relevant neural activity at lower and higher structural levels of the brain, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%