2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We should therefore not be surprised to learn that studies of both verb and noun morphology (Aguado-Orea & Pine, 2015; Dąbrowska, 2004, 2008; Dąbrowska & Szczerbinski, 2006; Engelmann et al, 2019; Granlund et al, 2019; Kirjavainen, Nikolaev, & Kidd, 2012; Kjærbæk, dePont Christensen, & Basbøll, 2014; Krajewski, Theakston, Lieven, & Tomasello, 2011; Kunnari et al, 2011; Leonard, Caselli, & Devescovi, 2002; Maratsos, 2000; Maslen et al, 2004; Räsänen et al, 2016; Rubino & Pine, 1998; Saviciute, Ambridge, & Pine, 2018) yield three findings that constitute evidence for an exemplar (or connectionist) account. The first is an effect of phonological neighbourhood density: the greater the number of phonological ‘friends’ or ‘neighbours’ – forms that are phonologically similar to the target and that take the same inflectional ending – the greater the rate at which children produce the target form correctly, and the lower the error rate.…”
Section: Morphologically Inflected Wordsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We should therefore not be surprised to learn that studies of both verb and noun morphology (Aguado-Orea & Pine, 2015; Dąbrowska, 2004, 2008; Dąbrowska & Szczerbinski, 2006; Engelmann et al, 2019; Granlund et al, 2019; Kirjavainen, Nikolaev, & Kidd, 2012; Kjærbæk, dePont Christensen, & Basbøll, 2014; Krajewski, Theakston, Lieven, & Tomasello, 2011; Kunnari et al, 2011; Leonard, Caselli, & Devescovi, 2002; Maratsos, 2000; Maslen et al, 2004; Räsänen et al, 2016; Rubino & Pine, 1998; Saviciute, Ambridge, & Pine, 2018) yield three findings that constitute evidence for an exemplar (or connectionist) account. The first is an effect of phonological neighbourhood density: the greater the number of phonological ‘friends’ or ‘neighbours’ – forms that are phonologically similar to the target and that take the same inflectional ending – the greater the rate at which children produce the target form correctly, and the lower the error rate.…”
Section: Morphologically Inflected Wordsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Existing studies of PND effects in young children concentrated mostly on the influence of PND on vocabulary development, word and pseudoword learning in noisy and no-noise conditions or on morphology acquisition in different languages rather than on the influence of a word's phonological neighbors on its production and recognition in terms of facilitation or inhibition (e.g., Dąbrowska & Szczerbiński, 2006; Han, Storkel & Bontempo, 2019; Hoover, Storkel & Hogan, 2010; van der Kleij, Rispens & Scheper, 2016; Granlund, Kolak, Vihman, Engelmann, Lieven, Pine, Theakston & Ambridge, 2019). For example, Savičiūtė, Ambridge and Pine (2018) studied how 4;0- to 5;5-year-old children acquired the Lithuanian inflectional noun morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the significant PND influence on the verbal past tense morphology acquisition was observed in Finnish, Icelandic, and Norwegian young children (Kirjavainen, Nikolaev & Kidd, 2012; Ragnarsdóttir, Simonsen & Plunkett, 1999). In a large-scale, elicited-production study of noun case marking in Polish, Finnish, and Estonian, Granlund et al , (2019) found that children produced noun forms more accurately for words with larger PND class in all three languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As many as 11 regional languages in Indonesia were declared extinctin 2018. Besides, four regional languages weredeclared critical and two regional languages were setbacks [1]. The extinct language comes from Maluku, namely the languages of the Kajeli/Kayeli, Piru, Moksela, Palumata, Ternateno, Hukumina, Hoti, Serua and Nila, and Papuan languages, namely Tandia and Mawes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%