2013
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2013.783113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language growth and genetics of specific language impairment

Abstract: Behavioural studies of children with specific language impairment (SLI) have reported long term growth outcomes across different dimensions of language. Genetic studies of children with SLI have identified candidate genes and putative associations of gene variants with SLI. The aims of this review are to summarize these two lines of investigation and to highlight the possible role of underlying growth timing mechanisms that influence the trajectory of language outcomes throughout childhood and into adolescence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
56
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with these differences across the linguistic dimensions, several characteristics were shared by growth in vocabulary and finiteness marking: On average, for both linguistic dimensions, children with SLI demonstrated growth trajectories that paralleled their peers although at a lower level of proficiency that did not resolve with age, followed by a deceleration that appeared around 10–12 years, which left the children with SLI with lower proficiency than their age peers as they moved into adulthood. In the context of genetics investigations, Rice proposes inherited maturational effects that operate across dimensions of language which interact with predictors in different ways (Rice, 2012, 2013). …”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with these differences across the linguistic dimensions, several characteristics were shared by growth in vocabulary and finiteness marking: On average, for both linguistic dimensions, children with SLI demonstrated growth trajectories that paralleled their peers although at a lower level of proficiency that did not resolve with age, followed by a deceleration that appeared around 10–12 years, which left the children with SLI with lower proficiency than their age peers as they moved into adulthood. In the context of genetics investigations, Rice proposes inherited maturational effects that operate across dimensions of language which interact with predictors in different ways (Rice, 2012, 2013). …”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comprehensive reviews, Rice (2012, 2013) integrated the findings about trajectories of language development in SLI with their possible genetic bases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could also at least partly explain the observation that lexical abilities appear to gradually improve as children with SLI get older [69,70], in particular because declarative memory improves during childhood [12]. Note that a dependence of lexical memory on declarative memory does not preclude an additional reliance of lexical memory on, or interactions with, various functions impaired in SLI, such as phonology, syntax, working memory, or recall, which would be expected to lead to some level of lexical deficits, perhaps continuing throughout the lifespan [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%