Language Maintenance in a Multilingual Family: Informal Heritage Language Lessons in Parent–Child Interactions

Abstract

The present study explores language socialization patterns in a Persian-Kurdish family in Sweden and examines how “one-parent, one-language” family language policies are instantiated and negotiated in parent–child interactions. The data consist of video-recordings and ethnographic observations of family interactions, as well as interviews. Detailed interactional analysis is employed to investigate parental language maintenance efforts and the child’s agentive orientation in relation to the recurrent interactional practices through which parents attempt to enforce a monolingual, heritage language “context” for parent–child interaction. We examine the interactional trajectories that develop in parents’ requests for translation that target the focus child’s (a7-year-old girl’s) lexical mixings. These practices resembled formal language instruction: The parents suspended the ongoing conversational activity, requested that the child translate the problematic item, modeled and assessed her language use. The instructional exchanges were asymmetrically organized: the parents positioned themselves as “experts”, insisting on the child’s active participation, whereas the child’s (affectively aggravated) resistance was frequent, and the parents recurrently accommodated the child by terminating the language instruction. The study argues that an examination of children’s agency, and the social dynamics characterizing parental attempts to shape children’s heritage language use, can provide significant insights into the conditions for language maintenance

Siblings' play and language shift to English in a Malay‐English bilingual family in Singapore

“…Gafaranga (, p. 249) showed that through this interactional practice, members of the community actually ‘talk[ed] language shift into being.’ With a similar focus on children's agency, Fogle's () analysis of the second language socialization processes in three adoptive families indicated how language ideologies, discourse practices, and family identities are negotiated and constructed in everyday activities. Exploring language socialization patterns in a Persian‐Kurdish family in Sweden, Kheirkhah and Cekaite () and Kheirkhah () also examined how family language policies, in these cases, one‐parent, one‐language, were instantiated and negotiated in parent–child interactions. They found that while the parents insisted on heritage language maintenance, even by suspending the on‐going conversation to explicitly teach a linguistic item to the child, the child's frequent affectively‐aggravated resistance made the parents accommodate to the child and terminate the language lesson.…”

Family Language Policy ten years on: A critical approach to family multilingualism

“…school and social networks) on attempts of families to maintain San Lucas Quiavianí Zapotec, and to unveil the language ideologies circulating within the communities under investigation. Kheirkhah and Cekaite (2015) examined the language practices of one Persian-Kurdish family in Swedish through video recordings, ethnographic observations and interviews. These methods allowed them to identify the different strategies used by parents in interaction with the child, and to emphasise the importance of considering children as agents in the implementation of family language policies.…”

Students’ Parents’ Attitudes toward Chinese Heritage Language Maintenance

“…The family members living in the same place tend to communicate in the same language and lead to language maintenance (Kheirkhah & Cekaite, 2015).…”