International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1989.266525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language model and acoustic model information in probabilistic speech recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (4), Ferretti et al defined the SDE parameter [3]. This tries to gather acoustic-context information by the use of the a posteriori probabilities given by acoustic modeling.…”
Section: Difficulty Measures For Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From (4), Ferretti et al defined the SDE parameter [3]. This tries to gather acoustic-context information by the use of the a posteriori probabilities given by acoustic modeling.…”
Section: Difficulty Measures For Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating SDD is easier than SDE [3] because of the a priori estimation of the acoustic probabilities P (a i jw) from the transcriptions of the words. SDD and SDE differ in the sense that the second parameter considers the actual recognition system implemented, while we have been assuming that the phonetic similarity between two elemental units can only be zero or one for SDD: Thus, we rename SDD as I SDD; ideal speech decoding difficulty, because the practical implementation of a speech recognition system, as in P P; is not considered.…”
Section: A Practical Speech Decoding Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%