2006
DOI: 10.1080/13682820500361497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language skills in 5–8‐year‐old children with 22q11 deletion syndrome

Abstract: Language difficulties in all investigated areas of language were found. It is suggested that speech-language impairment is a common feature of 22q11 deletion syndrome. An implication of these results is that follow-ups of language skills are important not only for pre-school children, but also for school age children and adolescents with 22q11 deletion syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
50
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, discrepancies in lexical abilities (higher expressive than receptive abilities in Glaser et al's study and the opposite in Moss et al's and in Gerdes et al's study) could be explained by a full-scale IQ spread ranging from 40 to 105 in Moss et al's study and in Glaser et al's study and from 42 to 92 in Gerdes et al's study. Therefore, variability in intelligence between participants may help explain our findings and the findings reported in previous studies on the morphosyntactic abilities of individuals with 22q11DS. Indeed, poor performance of children with 22q11DS on complex morphosyntactic tasks has often been reported (CusmanoOzog et al 2007;Golding-Kushner et al 1985;Persson et al 2006). For example, Persson et al (2006) documented reduced sentence length, problems in retelling a story and low grammatical complexity in children with 22q11DS compared with expectations for CA and performance IQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, discrepancies in lexical abilities (higher expressive than receptive abilities in Glaser et al's study and the opposite in Moss et al's and in Gerdes et al's study) could be explained by a full-scale IQ spread ranging from 40 to 105 in Moss et al's study and in Glaser et al's study and from 42 to 92 in Gerdes et al's study. Therefore, variability in intelligence between participants may help explain our findings and the findings reported in previous studies on the morphosyntactic abilities of individuals with 22q11DS. Indeed, poor performance of children with 22q11DS on complex morphosyntactic tasks has often been reported (CusmanoOzog et al 2007;Golding-Kushner et al 1985;Persson et al 2006). For example, Persson et al (2006) documented reduced sentence length, problems in retelling a story and low grammatical complexity in children with 22q11DS compared with expectations for CA and performance IQ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, poor performance of children with 22q11DS on complex morphosyntactic tasks has often been reported (CusmanoOzog et al 2007;Golding-Kushner et al 1985;Persson et al 2006). For example, Persson et al (2006) documented reduced sentence length, problems in retelling a story and low grammatical complexity in children with 22q11DS compared with expectations for CA and performance IQ. We found impaired morphosyntactic abilities (marked in comprehension and medium in production) in the children and adolescents with 22q11DS compared with their MA matched controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Las alteraciones del lenguaje serían transversales a todos los niveles: fonológico, semántico, morfosintáctico y del discurso (48) . En general se describe bajo conocimiento léxico, problemas para recordar vocabulario nuevo y una pobre habilidad comunicativa para escuchar y manejar información general y cultural, para hablar de situaciones de la vida real, transmitir ideas, pensamientos o sentimientos, para entregar detalles acerca de eventos, pedir ayuda en situaciones complicadas o participar en conversaciones técnicas, lo que se traduce muchas veces en dificultades pragmáticas que interfieren sus interacciones sociales (43) .…”
Section: Desarrollo Del Lenguajeunclassified
“…Incluso muchos pacientes no desarrollan un lenguaje acorde a las habilidades aprendidas (51) . La intervención debe continuar hacia la edad escolar y adolescencia (48) , orientada a estimular destrezas de conversación social, tales como qué decir, cómo decirlo, cuándo hacer un comentario; combinar indicaciones no verbales con la comprensión de otras intenciones, sin esperar que el niño entienda significados abstractos o "lea entre líneas".…”
Section: Alimentaciónunclassified