2017
DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.3.stas1-1703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language, Structure, and Reuse in the Electronic Health Record

Abstract: Medical language is at the heart of the electronic health record (EHR), with up to 70 percent of the information in that record being recorded in the natural language, free-text portion. In moving from paper medical records to EHRs, we have opened up opportunities for the reuse of this clinical information through automated search and analysis. Natural language, however, is challenging for computational methods. This paper examines the tension between the nuanced, qualitative nature of medical language and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as with most structured psychiatric assessments, clinicians tend to shun structured templates or drop-down options when keeping a record of their daily practice, 54,55 so the free-text note persists as the predominant method of recording clinical information. 56 This was certainly reflected in our EOP samples, as we were unable to detect any young people who had undergone a comprehensive assessment for NS using a standardized instrument at first presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, as with most structured psychiatric assessments, clinicians tend to shun structured templates or drop-down options when keeping a record of their daily practice, 54,55 so the free-text note persists as the predominant method of recording clinical information. 56 This was certainly reflected in our EOP samples, as we were unable to detect any young people who had undergone a comprehensive assessment for NS using a standardized instrument at first presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While from a research perspective it would be ideal for most or all EHR data to be captured via structured fields, there are practical barriers to this, including physician resistance to SDES use [7] and lack of ability to capture contextual information [17,18]. Hence, EHR systems such as SCM generally have the ability to capture unstructured data as well.…”
Section: Structured Ehr Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unstructured data refers to data elements that do not have a predefined or predetermined form. Unstructured free-text fields in EHRs contain essential clinical detail [17]. These allow medical staff to record the highly variable information that may be medically relevant, and which do not lend themselves easily to structured fields.…”
Section: Unstructured Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most articles did not specify whether the EPR under consideration was confined to use within a single healthcare practice/organisation or was shared [ 30 – 52 ], others refer to challenges and opportunities related to sharing data across organisational boundaries [ 53 57 ], nationwide [ 58 , 59 ] or even worldwide [ 21 ]. Some consider ethical issues that are associated with characteristics common to all EPR systems such as the nature of digital data [ 32 , 60 , 61 ], the confidentiality of health information [ 33 , 39 ] or the use of the copy-paste functionality [ 38 , 62 , 63 ]. Others focus on ethical issues around a particular EPR use, such as health insurance claims [ 64 ], clinical governance [ 65 ], medical education [ 35 , 66 – 69 ], health research [ 36 , 70 – 73 ], predictive analytics [ 74 ], learning health system [ 41 ], genomics, biomarkers and photos [ 31 , 34 , 75 78 ], public health policies or surveillance [ 79 – 81 ], health service monitoring, evaluation and planning [ 82 , 83 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, EPR technology may leave less room for human interaction and interpretation. The standardised structure of EPRs may limit documentation of individual patient nuances and narrow information captured by HCPs about their patients [ 32 , 149 – 152 ]. As a result, the patient may be seen as a series of data points rather than a human [ 82 , 130 , 153 , 154 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%