2021
DOI: 10.1177/00336882211061627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Teachers as Materials Developers

Abstract: This report reviews studies on language teachers as materials developers in language education, particularly focusing on how language teachers act as materials users, materials analysts, and materials designers when engaging with language learning and teaching materials. We contend that the three dimensions of materials development – that is, materials use, materials analysis, and materials design – intersect with one another, and that language teachers play a critical role in all three. Therefore, this review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, as predicted by the Douglas Fir Group's (2016) multilayered model, the macro‐level institutions of sociocultural values may shape emerging teacher leaders' cross‐level agentic actions in their identity (co)constructions and textbook development (Wu & Chen, 2018). In particular, Gee's cross‐level agentic actions to develop the EAP textbook may reflect the collectivist worldview highly appreciated in Chinese cultural tradition (Li et al, 2021), which prioritizes collective over individual actions. In Gee's case, her persistent endeavors to seek support from the reform community despite the numerous challenges encountered there helped ease her emotional tensions at other levels and hence played a decisive role in the development of an EAP textbook and her constructions of both EAP teacher and teacher leader identities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, as predicted by the Douglas Fir Group's (2016) multilayered model, the macro‐level institutions of sociocultural values may shape emerging teacher leaders' cross‐level agentic actions in their identity (co)constructions and textbook development (Wu & Chen, 2018). In particular, Gee's cross‐level agentic actions to develop the EAP textbook may reflect the collectivist worldview highly appreciated in Chinese cultural tradition (Li et al, 2021), which prioritizes collective over individual actions. In Gee's case, her persistent endeavors to seek support from the reform community despite the numerous challenges encountered there helped ease her emotional tensions at other levels and hence played a decisive role in the development of an EAP textbook and her constructions of both EAP teacher and teacher leader identities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher agency is theorized as individual teachers' capacity to make decisions and take actions toward their desired outcomes (Ruan et al, 2020) and is particularly highlighted in materials development during educational changes (Li et al, 2021). To address their newly assigned teaching needs to accommodate the reform requirements, language teachers may take such agentic actions as adapting, supplementing, and designing language teaching materials that are contextualized and localized (Li et al, 2021). However, despite the increasing expectation of language teachers as materials developers, they have largely been positioned as passive materials users and rarely as materials analysts or developers (de Laurentiis Brandão, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far most of the checklists designed for language materials evaluation have focused on textbooks (e.g., Bouzid, 2017; Işik, 2018; Li et al, 2021; Sukmana & Fitrawati, 2021). They contain various evaluation dimensions presented as questions.…”
Section: Concepts That Informed the Checklist Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature review also underscored how researchers have explored learning materials developed by teachers, most of the studies focused on in‐service teachers (e.g., Choi & Lo, 2022; Howard & Major, 2004; Li et al, 2021; Yuniarti, 2019) and paid little attention to how preservice teachers developed materials (e.g., Carabantes & Paran, 2022; de Laurentiis Brandão, 2018; Sert & Li, 2017; Usta & Güntepe, 2017) or how teacher educators evaluated these materials. Still, the literature review did reveal that teachers often approached materials design by applying language materials development principles (e.g., Núñez et al, 2009; Ota et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As “textbooks play a pivotal role in the success of language education” (Weninger & Kiss, 2013, p. 695), they are instrumental for English language teachers to engage with cultural representations in language teaching practices. Richards (1998) suggested that ELT textbooks function as a base upon which teachers, with their knowledge and skills, can evaluate and modify materials, if required, Derakhshan (2021); Hu et al (2021); Li et al (2021). Baker (2011) and Nault (2006) argued that the teaching of culture, through ELT textbooks, should be integral to four critical functions (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) of ELT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%