2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01302.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Languages for Specific Purposes Curriculum Creation and Implementation in Service to the U.S. Community

Abstract: Community service learning (CSL) is a type of experiential learning that blends specific course content with real-world applications and ties them together through structured reflection. It is an ideal pedagogy for 21st-century language for specific purposes (LSP) programs. This article frames that argument around sociocultural theory, moves to a discussion of existing models, materials, and research, and describes the relevance of CSL and LSP to the contexts of higher education, communities beyond campus, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the CQ workshops allowed students to develop the key professional skills mentioned by Grosse and Voght (1991), such as working in authentic settings, negotiating with professionals, and executing presentations, as well as responding to Lear's (2012) and Earley and Ang's (2003) calls for curricula that prepare students for diverse professional venues. Specifically, the workshops allowed students to develop and display CQ skills through analyzing cultural landscapes within an organization, choosing cultural values and systems that influenced an organization's Hispanic clientele, and developing strategies that would help professionals better serve those clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the CQ workshops allowed students to develop the key professional skills mentioned by Grosse and Voght (1991), such as working in authentic settings, negotiating with professionals, and executing presentations, as well as responding to Lear's (2012) and Earley and Ang's (2003) calls for curricula that prepare students for diverse professional venues. Specifically, the workshops allowed students to develop and display CQ skills through analyzing cultural landscapes within an organization, choosing cultural values and systems that influenced an organization's Hispanic clientele, and developing strategies that would help professionals better serve those clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on LSP courses has addressed a variety of languages both internationally (Basturkmen, ) and within a U.S. context (Grosse & Voght, , ; Lafford, ; Lear, ; Long & Uscinski, ; Martinsen, ; Sanchez‐Lopez, , ; Trace, Hudson, & Brown, ). In addition, the Modern Language Journal published a focus issue on LSP (2012).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fields of languages for specific purposes (LSP) and community servicelearning (CSL) have gained considerable popularity in US higher education over the last twenty years (Long & Uscinski, 2012;Lafford, Abbott & Lear, 2014;Sánchez-López, Long & Lafford, 2017). Most of the research thus far has examined the potential impact of both disciplines on second language (L2) learners (e.g., Lafford, 2012;Lamboy & Thompson, 2012;Lear, 2012;Sánchez-López, 2013;Abbott, 2017;Salgado-Robles & Kirven, in press; just to name a few). Despite the growing interest in these areas, little is known about the effect of LSP and CSL on heritage language (HL) learners, particularly as it relates to language proficiency and HL pedagogy (e.g., Pino, 2001;Angelelli & Degueldre, 2002;Martínez, 2010;Martínez & Schwartz, 2012;King de Ramírez, 2017;Ruggiero, 2018;Martínez & San Martín, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%