2002
DOI: 10.1021/ic020254g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanide−Transition-Metal Carbonyl Complexes. 1. Syntheses and Structures of Ytterbium(II) Solvent-Separated Ion Pairs and Isocarbonyl Polymeric Arrays of Tetracarbonylcobaltate

Abstract: Transmetalation reactions of metallic ytterbium with Hg[Co(CO)(4)](2) in the coordinating solvents pyridine and THF yield the solvent-separated ion pairs [Yb(L)(6)] [Co(CO)(4)](2) (1a, L = Pyr; 2a, L = THF). The IR spectrum of 1a in pyridine indicates that the tetracarbonylcobaltate anion is not directly bonded to the divalent Yb cation owing to the strong coordinating ability of pyridine. On the other hand, IR spectra of 2a in THF are concentration dependent. In dilute solutions there is an equilibrium betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bond lengths of 210–217 pm are found in aryloxo–ytterbium complexes, while YbO bond lengths in bridging aryloxo ligands lie in the range 224–234 pm 14. YbO bond lengths of 238–239 pm are reported for [Yb(thf) 6 ] 2+ with neutral tetrahydrofuran as a ligand 15. Unfortunately there are no structural data for Yb II –1,3‐diketone complexes available for comparison.…”
Section: Selected Interatomic Distances [Pm] For [Mppyr]2[yb(tf2n)4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bond lengths of 210–217 pm are found in aryloxo–ytterbium complexes, while YbO bond lengths in bridging aryloxo ligands lie in the range 224–234 pm 14. YbO bond lengths of 238–239 pm are reported for [Yb(thf) 6 ] 2+ with neutral tetrahydrofuran as a ligand 15. Unfortunately there are no structural data for Yb II –1,3‐diketone complexes available for comparison.…”
Section: Selected Interatomic Distances [Pm] For [Mppyr]2[yb(tf2n)4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the metal−metal bond distances in these complexes exceed 5 Å. 16,17 Complexes involving the less common covalent metal− metal bonding mode (Ln−M−CO) possess metal−metal bond lengths of ∼3 Å that are typical of transition metal−lanthanide bonds. 18−21 The two remaining possible bonding modes, a halide bridged structure without a metal−metal bond or the ion pair [(solvent) 4 LaCl 2 ] + [Ir(CO) 2 I 2 ] − , can also be discounted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common bonding mode is an isocarbonyl complex, Ln–OC–M (Ln = lanthanide and M = transition metal), wherein the lanthanide acts as a Lewis acid and is bound to the oxygen of one or more of the carbonyl ligands. However, the metal–metal bond distances in these complexes exceed 5 Å. , Complexes involving the less common covalent metal–metal bonding mode (Ln–M–CO) possess metal–metal bond lengths of ∼3 Å that are typical of transition metal–lanthanide bonds. The two remaining possible bonding modes, a halide bridged structure without a metal–metal bond or the ion pair [(solvent) 4 LaCl 2 ] + [Ir(CO) 2 I 2 ] − , can also be discounted. The former motif displays metal–metal distances of ∼4 Å or more, and the latter display even larger metal–metal distances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Aryloxo‐Ytterbium‐Komplexen werden Bindungslängen von 210–217 pm gefunden, die Abstände zwischen dem Ytterbiumatom und den Sauerstoffatomen der verbrückenden Aryloxo‐Liganden liegen zwischen 224 und 234 pm 14. Mit neutralem Tetrahydrofuran als Liganden wurden Yb‐O‐Abstände von 238–239 pm für [Yb(thf) 6 ] 2+ gefunden 15. Leider existieren keine Strukturdaten von Yb II ‐1,3‐Diketonat‐Komplexen zum Vergleich.…”
Section: Ausgewählte Bindungslängen [Pm] Für [Mppyr]2[yb(tf2n)4]unclassified