2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanthanides in metallic nuclear fuels: Their behavior and methods for their control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Table 3, a major amount of rare earths dissolved and accumulated in the melt, however 0.5-1.5% remained in the anode residues. According to previous reports [25,26], some of rare earths form alloys with noble metals during the irradiation. These rare earths possibly remained in the anode residues provided the Zr co-dissolution from the fuel segments was limited.…”
Section: Rare Earthsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As seen in Table 3, a major amount of rare earths dissolved and accumulated in the melt, however 0.5-1.5% remained in the anode residues. According to previous reports [25,26], some of rare earths form alloys with noble metals during the irradiation. These rare earths possibly remained in the anode residues provided the Zr co-dissolution from the fuel segments was limited.…”
Section: Rare Earthsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Because Am is easily lost during high-temperature processing (e.g., [12,13]), it is particularly important to correctly identify Am-bearing phases. Understanding rare-earth phases is also important because these elements can migrate to the surface of fuel pins during irradiation and interact with cladding to cause fuel failures [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding essentially pure deposits of lanthanide fission products in pores or at the cladding surface may lead one to think vapor phase transport is responsible, although the vapor pressure of lanthanide fission products varies by eleven orders of magnitude at 1000 K (Ce versus Sm) [33] so a FCCI rate dependence based upon vapor transport is unlikely, especially since Ce and Sm are both found in the FCCI layer in ratios near the ratio of their fission yields after cooling [18]. Recently, Mariani et al [34] have suggested that a liquid-phase transport mechanism may explain the experimental observations based on dissolution in sodium and/or cesium, although they do not offer a model for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Burnup and Temperature Dependant Fcci Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%