2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lap joints stiffness according to Eurocode EC3 and experimental investigations results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behaviour of a given joint in a frame structure will be described by proper hysteresis loops, and calculations of the frame will require to develop appropriate procedures, including incremental load and deformation analysis [22]. Then, the internal forces in the respective bars and displacements in the joints may significantly differ from the case in which the horizontal wind load acts only in one direction [23]. It was estimated that the differences between internal forces in the frame with rigid and semi-rigid joints may then exceed at least 20% [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behaviour of a given joint in a frame structure will be described by proper hysteresis loops, and calculations of the frame will require to develop appropriate procedures, including incremental load and deformation analysis [22]. Then, the internal forces in the respective bars and displacements in the joints may significantly differ from the case in which the horizontal wind load acts only in one direction [23]. It was estimated that the differences between internal forces in the frame with rigid and semi-rigid joints may then exceed at least 20% [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was estimated that the differences between internal forces in the frame with rigid and semi-rigid joints may then exceed at least 20% [18]. However, if additionally the impact of alternating action of the wind is takes into account, further changes in the forces have to be expected, reaching next 20% [23]. In such cases the use of linear relationships describing the rigidity of the joints -proposed in EC3 [7] and [24] may be too simplistic, because the calculation results may not reflect the actual behavior of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the graphs broken dashed lines correspond to the translational stiffness S 1 calculated according to the formulas proposed in [14], which were developed on the basis of the stiffness coefficients of the components of the joint specified in [18]. Horizontal part of the dashed line corresponds to the design resistance F b Rd , determined by [16].…”
Section: Tests Of Relationship F-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be compared with the two-section dashed lines. First section of the broken line corresponds to the initial rotational stiffness S j,ini of the joint, which was calculated according to the formulas given in [14], developed on the basis of the component method [18]. Horizontal section corresponds to the resistance of the connection, which results from a bearing capacity Similarly as observed in the tests of the elements "In", also here alternately bended joint (Fig.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation