2003
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200301000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Application Of Radio Frequency Energy Enables In Situ Renal Tumor Ablation And Partial Nephrectomy

Abstract: Early experience with laparoscopic radio frequency ablation in situ or combined with partial nephrectomy shows that it appears to be a safe method of managing small enhancing renal masses. Radio frequency assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is reserved for easily accessible exophytic tumors, while strict surveillance is required for lesions remaining in situ after ablation. Additional followup is required to assess long-term effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is not designed to compare RFA results with those of conservative surgery; however, in terms of safety, short-term local efficacy and mid-term patient outcome, RFA results seem to be better compared to those from surgical series [6]. Its clinical use in association with laparoscopic surgery has already been reported [12,13], and the substitution of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by minimally invasive techniques has been suggested [14]. Our RFA series cannot be correctly compared with other non-surgical treatments (cryotherapy above all), but according to data from the literature, it does not seem to be less useful [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our study is not designed to compare RFA results with those of conservative surgery; however, in terms of safety, short-term local efficacy and mid-term patient outcome, RFA results seem to be better compared to those from surgical series [6]. Its clinical use in association with laparoscopic surgery has already been reported [12,13], and the substitution of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by minimally invasive techniques has been suggested [14]. Our RFA series cannot be correctly compared with other non-surgical treatments (cryotherapy above all), but according to data from the literature, it does not seem to be less useful [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Jacomides et al [26] used a Model 1500X system (RITA Medical Systems, Inc., Mountain View, CA) to treat 17 renal tumors (mean, 1.96 cm) laparoscopically. Five ablated lesions were immediately excised for pathologic analysis.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the ablative technologies can be used laparoscopically or percutaneously; however, many authors believe that tumors on the anterior or medial aspect of the kidney should be approached laparoscopically [6,7]. The two most studied and commonly used modalities for renal ablation are RFA and cryoablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These side effects are reported to be higher than RFA in a porcine liver model [11], but have not been reproduced in a kidney model. Animal studies comparing RFA with cryoablation have showed that cryoablation causes less injury to the renal collecting systems [12], whereas RFA is less likely to produce significant hemorrhage [6,9,12]. Although the use of cryotherapy and RFA is safe and proving to be efficacious in the short term, the search for improved minimally invasive ablative therapies continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%