[306][307][308][309][310][311][312] Audit weeks. This would take the form of a cholecystectomy (and bile duct clearance if necessary) in fit patients and an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the unfit. Indeed the risk of recurrence of acute biliary pancreatitis in the presence of cholelithiasis could be as high as 60% within 6 months.
3Endoscopic sphincterotomy significantly reduces the risk of recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis in unfit patients to 2-5% at 2 years. [4][5][6] In the management of acute cholecystitis, the conventionally adopted approach of conservative treatment and interval cholecystectomy has its distinct disadvantages. Whilst the majority of patients respond to such treatment approach, up to one-fifth of patients fail to do so and require an urgent cholecystectomy. [7][8][9] Moreover, up to one-quarter of patients who have recovered from acute cholecystitis relapse while awaiting an interval cholecystectomy. 7 In a randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis some 25 years ago, Lahtinen and colleagues 7 found early surgery to be safe and associated with significantly shorter operating time, and had avoided the complications of failed medical treatment. A number of recent randomised clinical trials have addressed the timing and surgical approach to cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis, 9-13 and demonstrated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed during the index admission with acute cholecystitis was associated with a shorter hospital stay, 9,11-13 quicker recovery, 9 and a reduction in the overall treatment cost when compared with open cholecystectomy during the index admission with acute cholecystitis 12 or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 9,11,13 Moreover, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe, and earlier reports of increased risk of bile duct injuries 14 were not substantiated by more recent experiences. 9,11,13,15 The aims of this study, therefore, were to survey the currently adopted practice of the UK surgeons in the surgical management of acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis, to evaluate the impact of various subspecialty interests on the practice adopted, and to suggest pathways towards a better implementation of the guidelines and other evidence-based management approaches.
Materials and MethodsThe names and addresses of the practising members of the Association of the Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were obtained from the Association's office, and a postal questionnaire was sent to its 1086 current members. The survey included a general questionnaire, as well as a questionnaire that addressed the current practice adopted by each surgeon in relation to the timing and approach to the surgical management of acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis (see Appendix). The reply to the questionnaire was anonymous.
Statistical analysisThe replies were compiled on a computer database for analysis. Data were analysed using SPS...