1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80024-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of an infarcted epiploic appendage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last few years with the introduction of cross-sectional imaging and the increasing use of abdominal CT scans for primary evaluation of abdominal pain, the recognition of PEA is increasing. In the past, diagnosis in many patients was attained during surgery [8,9], but imaging procedures are now increasingly used for this purpose. Normal epiploic appendages cannot be seen on CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few years with the introduction of cross-sectional imaging and the increasing use of abdominal CT scans for primary evaluation of abdominal pain, the recognition of PEA is increasing. In the past, diagnosis in many patients was attained during surgery [8,9], but imaging procedures are now increasingly used for this purpose. Normal epiploic appendages cannot be seen on CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If treated nonoperatively, most patients recover in about 10 days, with resolution of CT findings after more than 6 months time [4,10]. However, if the diagnosis is uncertain or if medical management fails, laparoscopy has been shown to be effective in the diagnosis and treatment of epiploic appendagitis [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with indeterminate findings on CT scan a diagnostic laparoscopy would be useful [8, 9, 10]. Such an approach would be helpful even if the appearances reflect complicated appendicitis [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%