2008
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2007.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Mesh Repair with the “Double-Crown” Technique: A Case-Control Study

Abstract: Medium-term results indicate that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with the double-crown technique has a low complication rate and a comparable recurrence rate to open repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from transfascial suture fixation, the use of fixation elements is very widespread [1,[13][14][15]. However, the degree of retention strength achieved by the various techniques still is not clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from transfascial suture fixation, the use of fixation elements is very widespread [1,[13][14][15]. However, the degree of retention strength achieved by the various techniques still is not clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Here, result of this study also didn't find any shortfall in surgical outcome of these tack only mesh fixation after comparing with result of any other case series reported earlier in respect of LVHR. 22,23 At last, as reported earlier also, one thing is absolutely true that LVHR is a better way of repair for abdominal ventral hernia with less morbidity and recurrence in comparison to open technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, prosthetic meshes for LIHR was formally started to be sold after insurance coverage of LIHR. For these reasons, our follow-up period after LIHR was shorter than other studies [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…LIHR is well established as an effective surgical procedure alternative to open surgery by many retrospective case series 1,8,[11][12][13]22) and a few RCTs 14,15) . However, according to choice of either prosthetic mesh, further study is needed to establish which is suitable for LIHR regarding the rate of recurrences, adhesions and fistulas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation