1997
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.1997.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy: Selection of Patients and Consequences of Rupture of Ovarian Malignancy

Abstract: AA Rouzi, PF McComb, Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy: Selection of Patients and Consequences of Rupture of Ovarian Malignancy. 1997; 17(3): 321-325 Operative laparoscopy is gaining popularity and widespread application in gynecology. In response to a survey on operative laparoscopy by the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, the laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts was the third most common procedure reported.1 Technological advances and appropriate training have allowed ovarian cystecto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-eight of these studies were excluded due to a lack of comparison of progression-free survival or overall survival between the intraoperative capsule rupture and no capsule rupture groups (19 studies), incorrect study type according to our inclusion criteria (13 studies), incorrect population (three studies), incorrect intervention (two studies), and duplicate populations (one study). 6,16–52 The data quality of the remaining articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (Appendix 2, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/C345). Seventeen studies met all the criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-eight of these studies were excluded due to a lack of comparison of progression-free survival or overall survival between the intraoperative capsule rupture and no capsule rupture groups (19 studies), incorrect study type according to our inclusion criteria (13 studies), incorrect population (three studies), incorrect intervention (two studies), and duplicate populations (one study). 6,16–52 The data quality of the remaining articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (Appendix 2, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/C345). Seventeen studies met all the criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%