Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty:

Jarrett, Thomas W.; Chan, David; Charambura, Tanya C; Fugita, Oscar Eduardo Hidetoshi; Kavoussi, Louis R.

doi:10.1097/00005392-200203000-00011

Cited by 17 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jarret et al (121) , por exemplo, utilizaram a urografia excretora e/ou cintilografia na avaliação e seguimento dos primeiros 100 casos submetidos a pieloplastia laparoscópica pelo seu grupo, sendo realizado um exame inicial em 2 a 3 meses e anualmente após o procedimento, de modo semelhante ao seguimento realizado em nosso estudo.…”

Section: Intercorrências E Complicaçõesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da obstrução da junção pielo-ureteral por meio de pieloplastia vídeo-laparoscópica robótica assistida

Júnior¹,

Fernandes²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Intercorrências E Complicaçõesunclassified

“…Entretanto, na série de Jarrett et al, a melhora da hidronefrose nos períodos pré e pós-operatórios foi avaliada através de urografia endovenosa associada ou não a uma análise complementar com cintilografia renal (121) .…”

Section: Intercorrências E Complicaçõesunclassified

Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da obstrução da junção pielo-ureteral por meio de pieloplastia vídeo-laparoscópica robótica assistida

Júnior¹,

Fernandes²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cost‐effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Single center experience

Hemal

Goel

2003

Int J of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryObjective : Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP) is a minimally invasive treatment option for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. We report here our experience of performing cost-effective LPP on 24 patients at a single center. Methods : Between October 1999 and March 2002, LPP was performed in 24 patients (17 male, seven female; age range 8-51 years) including two patients who had failed previous endourologic treatments. In two patients with concomitant renal stones, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was also performed. LPP was conducted in a cost-reductive manner by both transperitoneal ( n = 12) and retroperitoneal ( n = 12) access. To reduce the cost, an indigenous balloon to create the retroperitoneal space, reusable ports, ordinary polyglactin suture and intracorporeal free-hand suturing were employed. To reduce operative time, antegrade stenting was also performed in some cases.Results : Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 16, Foley Y-V pyeloplasty in five and Fenger pyeloplasty in three patients. One patient required conversion to open surgery due to tension at the anastomosis site during Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. The mean operating time, blood loss, analgesic (pethidine) requirement, duration of drain and hospital stay for the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups were 170.3 and 187.6 min, 102.2 and 145.9 mL, 125 and 136.4 mg, 2.1 and 2.5 days, and 3.4 and 4.3 days, respectively. No significant complications were encountered apart from prolonged ileus in three patients in the transperitoneal group. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 months with a range of 2-24 months. Postoperative renal scan was performed at 3 months in 21 patients, and 1 year in 11 patients. There was evidence of equivocal obstruction in one patient, but there were no obstructions in the remaining patients. Conclusion

show abstract

Dismembered Percutaneous Endopyeloplasty: A New Procedure

Sharp

Desai

Molina

et al. 2005

Journal of Endourology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dismembered percutaneous Anderson-Hynes endopyeloplasty is technically feasible and is promising. Further technical experience and additional functional outcome analysis in the survival model are necessary. With the technique described herein, we introduce the concept of percutaneous intrarenal reconstructive surgery (PIRS), wherein advanced intrarenal and retroperitoneal dissection with reconstruction can be performed endourologically, further broadening the horizons of conventional percutaneous techniques.

show abstract

Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty:

Abstract: In experienced hands laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an effective alternative treatment for symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The results appear durable and comparable to open pyeloplasty with decreased postoperative morbidity.

Cited by 17 publications

References 28 publications

Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da obstrução da junção pielo-ureteral por meio de pieloplastia vídeo-laparoscópica robótica assistida

Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico da obstrução da junção pielo-ureteral por meio de pieloplastia vídeo-laparoscópica robótica assistida

Cost‐effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Single center experience

Dismembered Percutaneous Endopyeloplasty: A New Procedure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About