2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3481-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results

Abstract: The results showed that LR for PPU is feasible with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. Skill in laparoscopic abdominal emergencies is required. Perforations 1.5 cm or larger, posterior duodenal ulcers, and an MPI higher than 25 should be considered the main risk factors for conversion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Morbidity and mortality in our study was 18.1% and zero % as compared to 6.2% and zero respectively in study conducted by Ahmed Khan Sangrasi et al, [9] versus 9% and 1% respectively by Navez B et al [14] Gastroduodenal Perforation Mean age of patients presenting with gastro-duodenal perforation in our study was 54.14 ± 14.4 yrs. which was slightly lower than the study conducted by Ferdinando Agresta et al [20] and was consistent with age of 59 years as in study conducted by Simone Guadagni et al [21] Laparoscopic repair was successful in 4 patients (57.1%) while in 3 patients (42.9%), laparoscopy was converted to midline laparotomy. 2 cases were converted due to gross contamination, 1 case was converted due to large size of the perforation.…”
Section: Appendicular Perforationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Morbidity and mortality in our study was 18.1% and zero % as compared to 6.2% and zero respectively in study conducted by Ahmed Khan Sangrasi et al, [9] versus 9% and 1% respectively by Navez B et al [14] Gastroduodenal Perforation Mean age of patients presenting with gastro-duodenal perforation in our study was 54.14 ± 14.4 yrs. which was slightly lower than the study conducted by Ferdinando Agresta et al [20] and was consistent with age of 59 years as in study conducted by Simone Guadagni et al [21] Laparoscopic repair was successful in 4 patients (57.1%) while in 3 patients (42.9%), laparoscopy was converted to midline laparotomy. 2 cases were converted due to gross contamination, 1 case was converted due to large size of the perforation.…”
Section: Appendicular Perforationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…13,14 We found no suture leakage in our patients, using intraoperative endoscopy may help in reduce leaking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…18 One study suggests that laparoscopy tends to be more difficult to perform in older patients and perforations of 1.5 cm or larger and posterior duodenal ulcers were considered the main risk factors for conversion. 13 No conversions to open surgery were required in our study, however all ulcers were in the anterior surface and all perforations measured less than 1.5 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently Guadagni et al suggests that laparoscopic repair for PPU is feasible but skill in laparoscopic abdominal emergencies are required. Perforations 1.5 cm or larger, posterior duodenal ulcers should be considered the main risk factors for conversion [61]. …”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%