2005
DOI: 10.3310/hta9140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation

Abstract: Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
169
1
23

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
8
169
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 But the time taken to daily activities and to work was significantly less in the laparoscopy group, this argument seems to be of little worth. [15][16][17] There was no major complication observed in either group like any major vascular injury, visceral injury or bladder perforation only intraoperative inadvertent peritoneal breach was seen that difference was not significant between the two groups and the findings are consistent with the observations made by Ramshaw et al 18 In this study the postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of open surgery at any given time and this difference was statistically significant p<0.05. This may be attributed to reduction in the size of incision, no need of extra or bilateral incisions in case of bilateral hernias, minimal dissection and less handling of cord structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…13,14 But the time taken to daily activities and to work was significantly less in the laparoscopy group, this argument seems to be of little worth. [15][16][17] There was no major complication observed in either group like any major vascular injury, visceral injury or bladder perforation only intraoperative inadvertent peritoneal breach was seen that difference was not significant between the two groups and the findings are consistent with the observations made by Ramshaw et al 18 In this study the postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of open surgery at any given time and this difference was statistically significant p<0.05. This may be attributed to reduction in the size of incision, no need of extra or bilateral incisions in case of bilateral hernias, minimal dissection and less handling of cord structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Laparoscopic repair although a costlier option is better in terms of patient comfort and timesaving [16]. Suturing of mesh is technically difficult and time-consuming thus to fix it to the tissue to prevent its displacement, tacker was developed and used [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is documented as an excellent choice in numerous studies, providing patients a good quality of life, especially when performed by an experienced surgeon (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%