2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection: Short-term morbidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When colorectal resection is performed, post-operative complications include a higher rate of functional digestive and urinary outcomes [8]. In one series, major complications requiring further surgery occurred in 10.4% of patients and included: anastomotic leakage (4.7%), rectovaginal fistula (2.7%), anastomotic fistula (2%), perforation (0.5%), bowel obstruction (0.5%), uroperitoneum (1.5%), ureteral fistula (1%), bladder fistula (0.5%), pelvic abscess (0.5%), sepsis (0.5%), hemoperitoneum (2%), heterologous blood transfusion (6%), and, after 30 days, urinary retention (4.7%), constipation (2.6%) and peripheral sensory disturbance (1.5%) [9].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When colorectal resection is performed, post-operative complications include a higher rate of functional digestive and urinary outcomes [8]. In one series, major complications requiring further surgery occurred in 10.4% of patients and included: anastomotic leakage (4.7%), rectovaginal fistula (2.7%), anastomotic fistula (2%), perforation (0.5%), bowel obstruction (0.5%), uroperitoneum (1.5%), ureteral fistula (1%), bladder fistula (0.5%), pelvic abscess (0.5%), sepsis (0.5%), hemoperitoneum (2%), heterologous blood transfusion (6%), and, after 30 days, urinary retention (4.7%), constipation (2.6%) and peripheral sensory disturbance (1.5%) [9].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also five nonsystematic revisions published [3,28,[32][33][34]. In some of the studies, a radical treatment was assessed [5,13,15,[25][26][27][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56], while others assessed a conservative one [57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. There were six nonrandomized papers in which groups of patients with different therapeutic options were compared [30,[35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the majority of papers defended a conservative surgical approach directed toward the extirpation or ablation of the endometriosic lesions with minimal excisional surgery of the rectum [6,12,[65][66][67][68]. However, in the last decade, multiple authors have proposed more aggressive techniques including intestinal resection, especially in those cases with an affected muscularis propia of the rectum but also in those having an intact mucosa [5,13,15,[25][26][27][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. The argument used for the practice of this radical surgery is that of achieving the greatest resection possible of the endometriosic lesions, diminishing the postoperative symptomatology and avoiding any early relapse of the disease [41,42].…”
Section: Radical Surgery With Intestinal Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowel resection for endometriosis can be done open or with laparoscopic assistance, with similar outcomes [7]. Complications from the procedure can be considerable, including anemia requiring blood transfusion, anastomotic leakage, fistula formation, and bowel perforation or obstruction [8][9][10]. Given the significant morbidity associated with bowel resection, the symptomatic benefits need to outweigh the risks of surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%