Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

Sahakyan, Mushegh А.; Edwin, Bjørn; Alikhanov, Ruslan; Britskaia, N. N.; Brudvik, Kristoffer Watten; D’Hondt, Mathieu; Meyere, Céline De; Ефанов, Михаил; Hoff, Rune; Ismail, Warsan; Ivanecz, Arpad; Kazaryan, Airazat M.; Lassen, Kristoffer; Magdalenić, T.; Parmentier, Isabelle; Røsok, Bård I.; Villanger, Olaug; Yaqub, Sheraz

doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2143724

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

2022

DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2143724

|View full text |Cite

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

Mushegh А. Sahakyan

Bjørn Edwin

Ruslan Alikhanov

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies

Hu,

et al. 2023

Updates Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open LR (OLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) are heterogeneous. We aimed to compare LLR and OLR for ICCA based on propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies. Two reviewers independently searched the online databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for PSM studies that compared LLR and OLR for ICCA. The Ottawa–Newcastle Quality Assessment Scale with a cutoff of ≥ 7 was used to define higher-quality literature. Only ‘high-quality’ PSM analyses of the English language that met all our inclusion criteria were considered. A total of ten PSM trials were included in the analyses. Compared with OLR, although the lymph node dissection (LND) (RR = 0.67) and major hepatectomy rates were lower in the LLR group (RR = 0.87), higher R0 resections (RR = 1.05) and lower major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III) (RR = 0.72) were also observed in the LLR group. In addition, patients in the LLR group showed less estimated blood loss (MD = − 185.52 ml) and shorter hospital stays as well (MD = − 2.75 days). Further analysis found the overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.91), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.95), and recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.80) for patients with ICCA after LLR were all comparable to those of OLR. LLR for selected ICCA patients may be technically safe and feasible, providing short-term benefits and achieving oncological efficacy without compromising the long-term survival of the patients.

show abstract

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies

Hu,

et al. 2023

Updates Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Biliary tract cancer

Søreide,

Dopazo,

Berrevoet

et al. 2024

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Letter regarding ‘Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma’

Magyar

Beldi

Banz

2023

Journal of Hepatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies

Biliary tract cancer

Letter regarding ‘Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma’

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About