2021
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic versus robotic‐assisted Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy has been proposed as an alternative minimally invasive approach to traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of achalasia. This systematic review aims to compare the safety and post‐operative outcomes of the two procedures. Methods Systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE through Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane to identify clinical trials and retrospective analyses. Outcome measures used for meta‐analysis included operative time, estimated blood lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients in our study underwent minimally invasive surgery, either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted. Several retrospective studies have shown equivalent outcomes in comparing LHM and RHM with respect to operative time, complications, and success rates [8]. The length of myotomy in our study was 4-5 cm toward the esophageal side and 2-3 cm toward the stomach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…All patients in our study underwent minimally invasive surgery, either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted. Several retrospective studies have shown equivalent outcomes in comparing LHM and RHM with respect to operative time, complications, and success rates [8]. The length of myotomy in our study was 4-5 cm toward the esophageal side and 2-3 cm toward the stomach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Compared to laparoscopy, robotic Heller myotomy has been shown to reduce the rate of intraoperative perforations of the oesophageal mucosa, being associated to similar clinical outcomes and operative times 12–15,24 . A very recent systematic review with meta‐analysis (based on a total of 3214 patients) compared the efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic Heller myotomies for EA, confirming the superiority of the robotic approach in terms of safety due to the lower rate of oesophageal perforations 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…11 Nowadays, robotic surgery is considered by many to be the gold standard of surgical treatment for symptomatic EA, as it has proven to be safe and effective. [12][13][14][15] The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of intraoperative use of indocyanine green (ICG), as an alternative means to intraoperative endoscopy, to increase the accuracy of myotomy and to evaluate the integrity of the oesophageal mucosa at the end of the procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These striking technical advantages led to swift adoption of the robotic technology. This approach decreased the risk of open conversion both during complex, technically challenging surgical procedures and in severe conditions involving high risk patients [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. With the expiration of Intuitive’s original patent, there has been a burgeoning release of newer robotic surgery platforms and companies, like Medtronic’s Hugo ® system, which are making robotic-assisted surgery more accessible than ever.…”
Section: The Advent Of Robotic Surgery: a Mere Technological Innovation Or Something More?mentioning
confidence: 99%