“…However, these approaches have shown limited efficacy; in fact, fulvestrant only elicits a response in approximately 7% of ERa-positive tumors that regrow under AI therapy, although its clinical use is justified based on a clinical benefit rate of 32% (Chia et al, 2008). On the other hand, trials with combinations of AIs and growth factor signal inhibitors have not improved outcomes in most cases , except for recent results on novel combinations that are still under research (Baselga et al, 2009;Johnston et al, 2009). In this scenario, the dynamic profiles of our model coincide with previous findings concerning the relevance of growth factor signaling but, importantly, our data also support a different explanation of the role of ERa: firstly, the switch from pS118-to pS167-ERa, an isoform known to be related to MAPK/AKT signaling (Campbell et al, 2001), may indicate that sustained ERa expression is more a consequence of the activation of other pro-growth signals than a reflection of the importance of canonical ERa function; secondly, the fact that both over-and underexpressed gene sets during MCF7-LTED adaptation showed infra representation of ERa-responsive elements and were not enriched in 17bE2-mediated regulation from original MCF7 data (Carroll et al, 2006), suggests a molecular landscape in which ERa, despite sustained expression, is no longer a highly active transcription modulator.…”