'Lapins' on Ten Cherry Rootstocks in the Alpe Adria Region

Fajt, N.; Folini, L.; Bassi, Geeta; Siegler, H.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.2014.1020.51

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These objectives have been accomplished by using size controlling and precocity rootstocks. Rootstocks used in sweet cherry culture directly affect the size and form of the tree, as well as precocity and yield (Fajt et al, 2009;Lanauskas et al, 2012). Moreover, they affect pruning, training system and labour decisions (Long, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of â€˜0900 Ziraatâ€™ Sweet Cherry

Ağlar

Yıldız

Long

2016

Not Bot Horti Agrobo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of three rootstocks ('Gisela 5', 'Gisela 6' and 'MaxMa 14') and three training systems (Spanish bush, Steep leader and Vogel central leader) on early performance of '0900 Ziraat' sweet cherry were compared. There have been significant differences among both rootstocks and training systems in terms of tree heights. At the end of the fourth year, while the height of the trees grafted on 'Gisela 5' was 238.3 cm, those grafted on 'MaxMa 14' reached 266.4 cm in height. While the shortest tree height was obtained from Spanish bush system, heights of the trees in Steep leader and Vogel central leader training systems were found to be at similar levels. 'Gisela' 5 had lower trunk cross section area (TCSA) than 'Gisela 6' and 'MaxMa 14' rootstocks. Among three systems, trees trained to Steep leader had the highest TCSA, followed by Spanish bush and Vogel central leader. Interactions were found between rootstock and training system for yield and yield efficiency. On 'Gisela 6', cumulative yield of Vogel central leader system (17.0 g/tree) was significantly higher than Spanish bush (14.8 g/tree) and Steep leader (12.6 g/tree). On the other hand, on 'MaxMa 14', there were not significant differences in cumulative yield per tree among training systems. On 'Gisela 5' and 'Gisela 6', the highest yield efficiency were observed in trees trained as Vogel

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of â€˜0900 Ziraatâ€™ Sweet Cherry

Ağlar

Yıldız

Long

2016

Not Bot Horti Agrobo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…flesh/seed ratios of fruits on the trees grafted on MaxMa 14 rootstock were the highest and the lowest ratio values were observed with Gisela 6 and Gisela 5 rootstocks, though the ratio of Gisela 6 was insignificantly higher than the ratio of Gisela 5 ( Table 2). It has been verified that rootstock has effects on the fruit quality by several studies [14,15]. It has also been determined that acidity and pH value are affected considerably by rootstock.…”

Section: Fruit Yield and Qualitymentioning

confidence: 77%

“…Studies carried out regarding cracking issue support the results as well. Another significant result of the study is that 6% death rate has been detected among the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks [15]. In their study, show that all of the trees on Gisela 4 rootstocks in Croatia and 80% in Slovenia died before the study finished.…”

Section: Fruit Yield and Qualitymentioning

confidence: 93%

Influence of Rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on Performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry

Ağlar

Yıldız

2021

J. Basic Appl. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa 14 and SL 64) on performance of sweet cherry cultivar '0 900 Ziraat' during 2010-2013 years. The trail in randomized block design was established as to factorial design. Each graft combination included 20 trees. The trees was trained as Spanish Bush training system. At the end of study, effect of rootstocks on vegetative growth was found significant. It has been determined that the trees grafted on SL 64 and MaxMa 14 rootstocks were more vigorous than the those grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6. The rootstocks formed significant differences at the precocity. While the first blooming on the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks occurred at the second year after planting, the first blooming on the trees on MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks occurred at fourth year after planting. It has been determined that occur significant differences on yield per tree and yield efficiency among rootstocks. In terms of yield per tree and yield efficiency, While the lowest value was in SL 64 rootstock, the highest value was recorded in Gisela 5, and it has been determined that the differences between three rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14) were not significant. While fruits weight varied according to the rootstock used in study, the trees grafted on Gisela 5 had the smallest fruit. Accompanied with differences between MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks were not significant, the biggest fruits were produced on trees grafted on SL 64 rootstock. As a result of the statistical analysis, it has determined that the rootstocks that used in trial did not create significant differences on soluble solids content (SSC) value. One of the most significant diagnosis was 6 % mortality rate that occurred on trees grafted Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks.

show abstract

“…Los antecedentes indican que portainjerto y variedad varían su desempeño según la zona, lo que destaca la importancia de la selección local (Ljubojević et al, 2016;Sansavini and Lugli, 2014), especialmente cuando se usan portainjertos enanizantes (Fajt et al, 2014). La combinación portainjerto -variedad ideal es la que permite obtener alta producción de fruta sin daño o defecto, de tamaño comercial, de bajo costo de selección y de alta eficiencia en la gestión de cosecha.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Efecto de Adara-M2624 y otros siete portainjertos sobre daños y defectos de frutos de dos variedades de cereza (Prunus avium L.)

Tersoglio¹,

Setien

2022

AgriS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Los portainjertos modifican el desempeño del árbol, adaptándose a diferentes condiciones edafo-climáticas. El diseño experimental fue de bloques completos al azar, con seis repeticiones. El porcentaje de daño se midió a través de los siguientes componentes: fruto partido, ausencia de pedúnculo y daño mecánico. El porcentaje de defecto se midió con los siguientes componentes: fruto con espolón, frutos dobles y sutura profunda. La adición de daño y de defecto constituyó la pérdida total. Las condiciones climáticas, variedad y portainjerto influyeron sobre todas las variables. Los portainjertos influyen sobre las pérdidas de variedad Bing y Celeste. Los portainjertos que registraron la menor pérdida y, simultáneamente, el menor daño y defecto fueron SL 64, MxM 60 y Weiroot 13; mientras que CAB6P y Adara-Mariana 2624 redujeron los defectos, pero incrementaron los daños. Tanto GiSeLa®5 como GiSeLa®6 redujeron los daños, aunque GiSeLa®5 incrementó los defectos. Los portainjertos SL 64, MxM 60, Weirrot 13 y GiSeLa®6 redujeron agrietado, daño mecánico y sutura; CAB6P y Adara-Mariana 2624 redujeron sutura y espolón, pero incrementaron agrietado y daño mecánico; GiSeLa®5 redujo los tres tipos de daños e incrementó todos los tipos de defectos. Una adecuada selección del portainjerto disminuye pérdidas.

show abstract

'Lapins' on Ten Cherry Rootstocks in the Alpe Adria Region

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of â€˜0900 Ziraatâ€™ Sweet Cherry

The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Early Performance of â€˜0900 Ziraatâ€™ Sweet Cherry

Influence of Rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on Performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry

Efecto de Adara-M2624 y otros siete portainjertos sobre daños y defectos de frutos de dos variedades de cereza (Prunus avium L.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About