2014
DOI: 10.1214/14-ba872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laplace Approximation for Logistic Gaussian Process Density Estimation and Regression

Abstract: Logistic Gaussian process (LGP) priors provide a flexible alternative for modelling unknown densities. The smoothness properties of the density estimates can be controlled through the prior covariance structure of the LGP, but the challenge is the analytically intractable inference. In this paper, we present approximate Bayesian inference for LGP density estimation in a grid using Laplace's method to integrate over the non-Gaussian posterior distribution of latent function values and to determine the covarianc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semiparametric density model consists of a parametric component, specified by an exponential family, and a nonparametric component, specified by a logistic Gaussian process (see, e.g., Leonard 1978and Lenk 1988. The logistic Gaussian process, defined as the logistic transformation of a Gaussian process, provides a flexible model for estimating unknown densities using the covariance structure (see, e.g., Lenk 1991;Tokdar and Ghosh 2007;Riihimäki and Vehtari 2014).…”
Section: The Bsad Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semiparametric density model consists of a parametric component, specified by an exponential family, and a nonparametric component, specified by a logistic Gaussian process (see, e.g., Leonard 1978and Lenk 1988. The logistic Gaussian process, defined as the logistic transformation of a Gaussian process, provides a flexible model for estimating unknown densities using the covariance structure (see, e.g., Lenk 1991;Tokdar and Ghosh 2007;Riihimäki and Vehtari 2014).…”
Section: The Bsad Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to lack of conjugacy, p(y i | θ i , Z i , T ) is not available explicitly. Therefore, we use a Laplace approximation [Riihimäki et al, 2014] to integrate over f i in each partition element. The posterior approximation of f i takes the following form in each partition…”
Section: The Data Generating Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ 2 i is the magnitude hyperparameter and l i is a length-scale hyperparameter which together govern the smoothness properties of f i . We place a weakly informative half Student-t distribution with one degree of freedom and a variance equal to 10 for the magnitude parameter and the same prior with a variance of 1 for the length-scale hyperparameter [Riihimäki et al, 2014]. We then obtain the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of the posterior mode of θ i using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) quasi-Newton algorithm and set θ i equal to this value.…”
Section: The Data Generating Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make inference more tractable, we discretize the interval [0,1] into m equally spaced sub‐intervals. The use of grid points is a popular approach in Gaussian process density estimation (Tokdar & Ghosh, ; Riihimäki & Vehtari, ). Because of the discretization, the computational complexity is independent of the number of observations.…”
Section: A Class Of Prior Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%