Laporan Pelaksanaan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Daerah Kabupaten Tuban Tahun 2016

Wisnujati, Nugrahini Susantinah

doi:10.30742/jisa.v17i1.379

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is because of the percentage of poor people at Tuban increased from the previous year. Based on the news in suarabanyuurip.com (accessed 30-May-2019), the poverty level of Tuban is ranked fifth out of all District/City in East Java [25]. In addition, the percentage of clean water user households in Tuban District is very low, similar to Trenggalek and Situbondo District.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Disadvantaged Regions in East Java Based-on the 33 Indicators of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration Using the Ensemble ROCK (Robust Clustering Using Link) Method

Wulandari¹,

Farida²,

Fanani³

et al. 2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

East Java province is a large province in Indonesia, in which Surabaya is the second largest metropolitan city after Jakarta. Various problems of development inequality in East Java have caused East Java to be defined as a disadvantaged area in 2015. The determination of disadvantaged regions is carried out every 5 years using 6 criteria and 33 indicators that have been set by the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration. However, from several studies that have been conducted on the determination of disadvantaged regions, there is no research applies 33 indicators as a whole. So in this study, an evaluation of the determination of disadvantaged regions will be carried out using 33 indicators that have been determined by The Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration. Criteria data used are the results of the 2014 and 2018 surveys. These data are in the form of numerical data and categorical data. The method used is ensemble Robust Clustering Using Link (ROCK), which is a clustering method that can accommodate mixed data both categorical and numerical, using the concept of distance to measure the similarity or closeness between a pair of data points. The best cluster results for evaluating the determination of disadvantaged regions in 2020 consist of 4 clusters with the smallest Sw and Sb ratio of 0.3873984 and the optimum threshold value of 0.04. The results of the clustering,

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Disadvantaged Regions in East Java Based-on the 33 Indicators of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration Using the Ensemble ROCK (Robust Clustering Using Link) Method

Wulandari¹,

Farida²,

Fanani³

et al. 2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kemiskinan diukur dalam bentuk penghasilan yang diperoleh dalam kurun waktu, dengan indeks pengeluaran tiap bulan masing-masing penduduk miskin (Tursilarini & Udiati, 2020). Adanya usaha Pemerintah dalam mengatasi persoalan kemiskinan membawa hasil ditunjukkan dengan skala menurunnya jumlah penduduk miskin, pendapatan yang selalu meningkat dalam setiap periode (Wisnujati, 2017). (Megawati et al, 2017) mengemukakan bahwa pemenuhan aspek kesehatan, pendidikan dan daya beli menjadi fokus utama yang harus diprioritaskan Kemiskinan selalu menjadi persoalan bagi Pemerintah karena di satu sisi kemiskinan menunjukkan skala pembangunan perekonomian dan disisi lain sebagai tolok ukur laju pembangunan (Nisa & Setyadharma, 2020).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Namun, seiring berjalannya waktu sumber dana dari APBD tidak mencukupi dan terbatas. Dibuktikan dengan hasil penelitian (Wisnujati, 2017) menyatakan bahwa program rehabilitas rumah tidak layak huni memenuhi kriteria dalam menuntaskan persoalan kemiskinan. Dengan tepat sasaran mengenai 4 (empat) dari 14 (empat belas) indikator kemiskinan yang tercantum di BPS, tetapi permasalahan dari program ini yaitu sumber dana terbatas yang dimiliki pemerintah, sehingga pemberian bantuannya pun belum terjangkau luas.…”

Section: ) Finansialunclassified

Evaluasi Program Rehabilitasi Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (Rtlh) Di Kabupaten Tuban

Anggraini¹,

Kurniawan²

2021

Publika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Salah satu yang menunjukkan skala kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat yaitu rumah layak huni, akan tetapi kenyataannya di Kabupaten Tuban masih ditemukan permasalahan tentang perumahan yang belum terjangkau untuk masyarakat menengah kebawah. Permasalahan pemukiman dan perumahan merupakan salah satu tolok ukur menentukan standar kemiskinan. Sehingga Pemerintah Kabupaten Tuban melalui Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Pemukiman Kabupaten Tuban, mengacu pada Peraturan Menteri Sosial Nomor 20 Tahun 2017 Tentang Rehabilitasi Sosial Rumah Tidak Layak Huni dan Sarana Prasarana. Program Rehabilitasi Rumah Tidak Layak Huni merupakan bantuan diperuntukkan masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah yang bertujuan meningkatkan taraf hidup menjadi lebih baik juga memberikan kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat menengah ke bawah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan fokus penelitian menggunakan teori (Agustino, 2017) meliputi sumber daya aparatur, kelembagaan, sarana prasarana dan teknologi, finansial, serta regulasi. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan data primer dan sekunder. Melalui buku-buku, jurnal, skripsi, regulasi, dokumentasi dan wawancara yang ditambahkan untuk mendeskripsikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan evaluasi Program Rehabilitasi Rumah Tidak Layak Huni di Kabupaten Tuban sejak 2007 berjalan dengan baik ditunjukkan dengan target realisasi pelaksanaan program tahun 2016 hingga tahun 2020 mencapai 5.276 unit. Namun demikian hasil temuan menunjukkan belum optimal. Terbukti dengan masih terbatasnya sumber daya aparatur untuk tenaga teknis dan tenaga pengawas di Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Permukiman. Selanjutnya indikator koordinasi yang dilakukan belum menyeluruh hingga ke 20 kecamatan. Kemudian belum terpenuhinya indikator sarana prasarana teknologi dalam mendukung kinerja program rehabilitasi rumah tidak layak huni di kabupaten tuban. Kata Kunci: Perumahan Rakyat, Evaluasi Program, Rumah Tidak Layak Huni One shows the scale of welfare for the community, namely a liveable house, but in reality, in Tuban Regency, there are still problems regarding unreached housing for the middle to lower class. Settlement and housing problems are one of the benchmarks in determining poverty standards. The Tuban Regency Government, through the Public Housing and Settlement Area Office of Tuban Regency, refers to the Minister of Social Affairs Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Social Rehabilitation of Unworthy Houses and Infrastructure. The Rehabilitation Program for Unfit for Living Houses is an aid intended for low-income people to increase their standard of living for the better and provide welfare for the middle to lower class communities. This research uses qualitative methods with a research focus using theory (Agustino, 2017) covering apparatus resources, institutions, infrastructure and technology, finance, and regulations. Data collection techniques are carried out using primary and secondary data through books, journals, theses, and regulations. Documentation and interviews were added for description. The results showed that the evaluation of the Rehabilitation Program for Unfit for Living Houses in Tuban Regency since 2007 has been going well, as indicated by the realization of the program implementation target from 2016 to 2020, reaching 5,276 units. However, the findings show that it is not optimal. It is proven by the limited resources of the apparatus for technical personnel and supervisors in the Public Housing and Settlement Areas Service. Furthermore, the coordination indicators carried out were not comprehensive in up to 20 districts. The indicators of technology infrastructure have not yet been fulfilled in supporting the performance of the rehabilitation program for unfit for habitation in Tuban Regency. Keywords: Public Housing, Program Evaluation, Unworthy Houses

show abstract

Laporan Pelaksanaan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Daerah Kabupaten Tuban Tahun 2016

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluation of Disadvantaged Regions in East Java Based-on the 33 Indicators of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration Using the Ensemble ROCK (Robust Clustering Using Link) Method

Evaluation of Disadvantaged Regions in East Java Based-on the 33 Indicators of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration Using the Ensemble ROCK (Robust Clustering Using Link) Method

Evaluasi Program Rehabilitasi Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (Rtlh) Di Kabupaten Tuban

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About