Lard-eaters, gay-ropeans, sheeple and prepositions: lexical and syntactic devices employed to position the other in Russian online political forums

Abstract

The study focuses on the linguistic means employed by Russians in online political message boards to position both the political self and the political other in a time of crisis. It investigates how insults and the prepositional choice of either v/na + Ukraine were used to demarcate socio-political identity boundaries. The paper highlights the typologically different insults used by each group to position the other politically and then proceeds to examine how prepositional choice is employed to position the political self. Data were gathered from two online news platforms – svoboda.org and slon.ru – dating from the beginning of February 2014 to the end of March 2014 and focus on the discourse of two polarised political groups of commenters – pro-Kremlin and anti-Kremlin. It is a mixed methodological approach drawing on comments posted in response to 361 articles by 476 separate posters. The data are subsequently analysed according to positioning theory within the paradigm of computer-mediated discourse

The sexually frustrated, the dumb and the libtard traitors: A typology of insults used in the positioning of multiple others in Irish online discourse relating to refugees, asylum seekers, immigrants and migrants

“…This shift in behaviour is reflected in the increasing number of newspapers that have a social media presence. This facilitates greater interaction ‘constructing an intertextuality not only with the presenter but also with other commenters’ (Devlin, 2016: 54). According to Devlin (2016), this allows ‘lay participants the opportunity to challenge the hegemony of an omniscient presenter or journalist’ in such a way that online ‘commenters become not only consumers of political discourse but also creators and negotiators of it’ (p. 54).…”

“…This facilitates greater interaction ‘constructing an intertextuality not only with the presenter but also with other commenters’ (Devlin, 2016: 54). According to Devlin (2016), this allows ‘lay participants the opportunity to challenge the hegemony of an omniscient presenter or journalist’ in such a way that online ‘commenters become not only consumers of political discourse but also creators and negotiators of it’ (p. 54). This study focuses on the discourse produced at the often fractious border between print media and the socially mediated domain where the online platform of Facebook redirects the principal locus of discourse away from the edited and sanctioned piece of journalism towards the often spontaneous, divisive, reactive and interactive exchanges between those who comment.…”

“KKona where’s your sense of patriotism?”: Positioning Nationality in the Spectatorship of Competitive Overwatch Play

“…By making stereotypes public within a conversation, actors use them as rhetorical devices in the process of positioning. In the realm of discourse online, for example, Devlin (2016) illustrated how participants on Russian online political message boards used national or ethnic insults drawing on stereotypes as a way to construct the cultural other and to demarcate boundaries between 'us' and 'them'.…”

“A Shameless Ideology of Shameless Women”: Positioning the Other in Social Media Discourse Surrounding a Women’s Rights Movement in Pakistan

“…Social media has allowed global activists to advocate discourses and narratives on pressing issues (Seo et al, 2009). It further allows individuals to engage in discussions with like-minded people (Posner, 2001) which has been shown to lead to an active discursive construction of the “other” (Devlin, 2016). This type of engagement is also prevalent in the activities of online hate groups as they “provide links to one another, and expressly attempt to encourage both recruitment and discussion among like-minded people” (Sunstein, 2007, pp.…”