2015
DOI: 10.5194/tc-9-411-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-area land surface simulations in heterogeneous terrain driven by global data sets: application to mountain permafrost

Abstract: Abstract. Numerical simulations of land surface processes are important in order to perform landscape-scale assessments of earth systems. This task is problematic in complex terrain due to (i) high-resolution grids required to capture strong lateral variability, and (ii) lack of meteorological forcing data where they are required. In this study we test a topography and climate processor, which is designed for use with large-area land surface simulation, in complex and remote terrain. The scheme is driven entir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist a variety of approaches for how such small-scale variability of different factors can be included in modelling (e.g. Fiddes et al, 2015;Kurylyk et al, 2016;Westermann et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2012). As exemplified by Gisnås et al (2014) for mountain permafrost environments in Norway, redistribution of snow due to wind drift could be a governing factor for the ground thermal regime also in palsa mires, especially since palsas and peat plateaus are elevated landscape elements which feature lower snow depths than the surrounding mire area (Seppälä, 1982).…”
Section: Implications For Permafrost Modelling and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist a variety of approaches for how such small-scale variability of different factors can be included in modelling (e.g. Fiddes et al, 2015;Kurylyk et al, 2016;Westermann et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2012). As exemplified by Gisnås et al (2014) for mountain permafrost environments in Norway, redistribution of snow due to wind drift could be a governing factor for the ground thermal regime also in palsa mires, especially since palsas and peat plateaus are elevated landscape elements which feature lower snow depths than the surrounding mire area (Seppälä, 1982).…”
Section: Implications For Permafrost Modelling and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at present such application is limited by a number of shortcomings and complications: first, the model scale of 1 km 2 may be sufficient to represent the ground thermal regime in lowland tundra landscapes like the LRD but is significantly too coarse for heterogeneous terrain, e.g., in mountain areas (Fiddes et al, 2015). Since the grid cell size is determined by the spatial resolution of the remotely sensed land surface temperatures, it could only be improved with the deployment of higher-resolution remote sensors for surface temperature (which must also feature a high temporal resolution).…”
Section: Towards Remote Detection Of Ground Temperature and Thaw Deptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially distributed permafrost modeling was, for example, demonstrated by Zhang et al (2013) and Westermann et al (2013), forced by interpolations of meteorological measurements, or by Jafarov et al (2012) and Fiddes et al (2015) by downscaled atmospheric model data. Remote-sensing data sets have been extensively used to indirectly infer the ground thermal state through surface observations, e.g., occurrence and evolution of thermokarst features (e.g., Jones et al, 2011), vegetation types characteristic for permafrost (Panda et al, 2014) or change detection of spectral indices (Nitze and Grosse, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of great importance, since an accurately modelled snow cover evolution and its spatial patterns are crucial to correctly model the ground thermal regime (Fiddes et al, 2015;Hoelzle et al, 2001;Stocker-Mittaz et al, 2002) and assess contrasting influences of a heterogeneous snow cover on the ground thermal regime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of integrating representative precipitation input (e.g. Imhof et al, 2000;Fiddes et al, 2015;Stocker-Mittaz et al, 2002) in the rock walls and its redistribution by wind (Mott and Lehning, 2010), as well as gravitational transport (Bernhardt and Schulz, 2010;Gruber, 2007), was thus accounted for. Model performance for simulating snow depth distribution and consequently the influence on rock temperatures was tested against a dense network of validation measurements of snow depth and NSRTs at both the point and the spatial scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%