2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large cardinals need not be large in HOD

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that large cardinals need not generally exhibit their large cardinal nature in HOD. For example, a supercompact cardinal κ need not be weakly compact in HOD, and there can be a proper class of supercompact cardinals in V , none of them weakly compact in HOD, with no supercompact cardinals in HOD. Similar results hold for many other types of large cardinals, such as measurable and strong cardinals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we assume that W ⊆ V is such that V = W [h], where h is W -generic for some set partial ordering Q ∈ W . By [7,Lemma 19], for κ > |Q| a singular cardinal, the models W and V will agree on the properties "♦ * κ ++ holds" and "♦ * κ ++ fails". As the proof of Lemma 2.3 shows, every set of ordinals x ∈ V is coded using the oracle "Either ♦ * κ ++ holds or fails for κ a singular cardinal".…”
Section: The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we assume that W ⊆ V is such that V = W [h], where h is W -generic for some set partial ordering Q ∈ W . By [7,Lemma 19], for κ > |Q| a singular cardinal, the models W and V will agree on the properties "♦ * κ ++ holds" and "♦ * κ ++ fails". As the proof of Lemma 2.3 shows, every set of ordinals x ∈ V is coded using the oracle "Either ♦ * κ ++ holds or fails for κ a singular cardinal".…”
Section: The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , very large cardinals such as supercompact cardinals in boldV are forced not to exhibit their large cardinal properties in boldHOD: they can be very small (not even weakly compact) in boldHOD. A reasonable natural question would be how far this can be taken, that is whether there exists a supercompact cardinal in boldV which is not only not even weakly compact in boldHOD but also has no other cardinals in boldHOD which exhibit large cardinal behavior.…”
Section: The Boldhod Hypothesis and A Supercompact Cardinalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining under which hypothesis boldHOD and boldV are close to each other and how boldHOD and boldV can be pushed apart via forcing is a very interesting area of research. From , via forcing, behaviors of large cardinals from boldV can become disordered in boldHOD. A natural question is whether the boldHOD Hypothesis has some effect on the behavior of large cardinals from boldV in boldHOD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One application of the main theorem is that any GCH pattern can be forced above a remarkable cardinal. Another application uses a recent forcing construction of [2], to produce a remarkable cardinal that is not weakly compact in HOD. Using techniques from the proof of the main theorem, we also show that remarkability is preserved by the canonical forcing of the GCH.…”
Section: Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that it is consistent to realize any possible continuum pattern above a remarkable cardinal. Using techniques developed recently in [2], we show that it is consistent to have a remarkable cardinal that is not remarkable, and indeed not even weakly compact in HOD.…”
Section: Applications Of Indestructibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%